Source: Porirua City Council
A Welcoming Plan for Porirua City was adopted by Te Puna Kōrero at its meeting this morning.
Source: Porirua City Council
A Welcoming Plan for Porirua City was adopted by Te Puna Kōrero at its meeting this morning.
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-NZ-AU)
PERTH, Australia, Aug. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Paladin Energy Ltd (ASX:PDN, TSX:PDN, OTCQX:PALAF) (“Paladin” or the “Company”) provides an update on the Patterson Lake South (PLS) Project following a detailed technical review, including capital and operating costs, as part of the ongoing Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) work (the “Engineering Review”).
The PLS Project hosts Triple R, a shallow, undeveloped high-quality uranium deposit located in the Athabasca Basin Region, in Saskatchewan, Canada. Paladin acquired the PLS Project through its acquisition of Fission Uranium Corp. in December 20241.
Highlights
The Engineering Review was conducted as part of the Company’s ongoing FEED work and builds on the technical report titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report, for PLS Property” dated 17 January 2023 (2023 Feasibility Study)9.
Paul Hemburrow, incoming Paladin MD & CEO, commented:
“Completing our comprehensive review of the 2023 Feasibility Study, together with our recent First Nations agreements and NROP exemption, represents a significant advance in the derisking and delivery of the PLS Project. The review confirms the technical robustness of the PLS Project, providing a strong foundation for its successful development, and it also highlights for investors the significant progress that has been achieved since Paladin acquired this important asset.”
“The review demonstrates our unwavering commitment to bringing the PLS Project into production by early next decade, while continuing to de-risk the development through FEED, and conducting further exploration to identify future expansion opportunities. We are confident that this project will deliver long-term value for all stakeholders, while upholding the highest standards of safety, operational efficiency and sustainability.”
Tetra Tech Canada Inc. (Tetra Tech) was engaged to develop an updated FEED stage cost estimate, including a review focused on all mining, process and surface infrastructure. Tetra Tech was supported by Mining Plus Canada Consulting Inc. on underground development and mining and Clifton Engineering Group Ltd on civil design and Tailing Management Facility (TMF) design.
The Engineering Review has identified design improvements and enhancements including changes to the process plant layout and footprint, improved site logistics and access and upgrades to offices, workshops and camp infrastructure.
The findings of the Engineering Review include updated estimates for the capital, operating and sustaining costs for the PLS Project, as well as the corresponding impact on NPV, Internal Rate of Return (IRR), annual post-tax, free-cash-flow (FCF) and expected payback period.
The economics incorporate FEED stage pre-production capital costs estimated at US$1,226 million, average LOM cash operating costs estimated at US$11.7/lb U3O82 and LOM sustaining capital costs estimated at US$325 million4,10, inclusive of contingency. The updated capital and operating costs reflect the advancement of engineering, procurement, operability and optimised safety, as well as escalation and inflationary impacts. There was no change to the mineral reserve or mineral resource estimates, or any other material scientific or technical information, disclosed in the 2023 Feasibility Study as a result of the Engineering Review11,12.
The overall economics remain strongly positive with the PLS Project having an estimated NPV (8% real discount rate, post-tax) of US$1,325 million, IRR of 28.2% (post-tax)13 and payback period of 2.4 years14 using a US$90/lb (real) long-term uranium price assumption2,7. Average FCF is estimated to be US$430 million per annum over the LOM4. The sensitivity of NPV, IRR and FCF to changes in uranium price is presented below.
Sensitivity of the PLS Project’s Economics to Uranium Price
Uranium Price15 | NPV8 (Post-Tax) | IRR (Post-Tax) | Avg. p.a. FCF (Post-Tax) | |
US$ | US$M | % | US$M | |
$120/lb | 2,172 | 37.50 | % | 586 |
$110/lb | 1,891 | 34.60 | % | 534 |
$100/lb | 1,609 | 31.50 | % | 482 |
$90/lb7 | 1,325 | 28.20 | % | 430 |
$80/lb | 1,043 | 24.70 | % | 379 |
$70/lb | 759 | 20.80 | % | 327 |
$65/lb16 | 617 | 18.70 | % | 302 |
$60/lb | 472 | 16.40 | % | 275 |
The Engineering Review has also resulted in an update to the anticipated project schedule, with first uranium production at the PLS Project targeted to occur in 2031. The schedule reflects anticipated engineering, procurement, construction and regulatory approval timelines and assumptions reviewed during the Engineering Review8.
Further detail is contained in the presentation accompanying this announcement, which is available on the Company’s website.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of Directors of Paladin Energy Ltd.
For further information contact:
Notes
Forward-looking statements
This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to Paladin’s business and operations, market conditions, results of operations and financial condition which reflect Paladin’s views held as at the date of this announcement. All statements, other than statements of historical or present facts, are forward-looking statements and generally may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as ‘guidance’, ‘foresee’, ‘likely’, ‘potential’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘aim’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘may’, ‘target’, ‘plan’, ‘forecast’, ‘project’, ‘schedule’, ‘will’, ‘should’, ‘seek’ and other similar words or expressions. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the results of the Engineering Review, including estimates for the capital, operating and sustaining costs for the PLS Project, as well as the corresponding impact on NPV, IRR, annual FCF and expected payback period; estimated LOM production and average annual production for the PLS Project; the anticipated project schedule for the PLS Project; the PLS Project achieving first uranium production in 2031; expected design improvements and enhancements for the PLS Project; and the sensitivity of NPV, IRR and FCF to changes in uranium price. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to inherent known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Paladin, its related bodies corporate and their respective officers, directors, employees, advisers or representatives. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in commodity prices and exchange rates; the impact of political instability on economic activity and uranium supply and demand; political risk; climate risk; operating hazards, natural disasters, severe storms and other adverse weather conditions; regulatory concerns; general economic and market conditions, general uranium industry factors; and a shortage of skilled labour and construction materials, equipment and supplies. Investors are strongly cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Actual results or performance may vary materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any forward-looking statements. All information included in this announcement, including any forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date of this announcement and, except as required by law or regulation, Paladin does not undertake to update or revise any information or forward-looking statements contained in this announcement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
To the extent any forward-looking statement in this Presentation constitutes “future-oriented financial information” or “financial outlooks” within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, such information is provided to demonstrate the Company’s internal projections and to help readers understand Paladin’s expected financial results. Readers are cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and readers should not place undue reliance on such information. Future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks, as with forward-looking statements generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions, and subject to the risks and uncertainties, described above.
Although the Company has attempted to identify key risks and factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors and risks that cause actions, events or results not to be anticipated, estimated or intended, including those risk factors discussed in the Company’s 2025 Annual Report and other public filings. This announcement should be read together with Paladin’s periodic and continuous disclosure, available at www.paladinenergy.com.au and www.sedarplus.ca.
Technical Information
The scientific and technical information relating to the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates in this announcement was reviewed and approved by Kanan Sarioglu, VP Exploration of Paladin Canada Inc. (formerly, Fission Uranium Corp.), a “qualified person” under NI 43-101.
The technical report referred to herein titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report, for PLS Property” dated 17 January 2023 was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators and is available on www.sedarplus.ca.
1 Refer to Paladin’s exchange announcement titled “Paladin completes acquisition of Fission” dated 24 December 2024. Fission Uranium Corp. was renamed Paladin Canada Inc. in August 2025.
2 Refer to the technical report titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report, for PLS Property” with an effective date of 17 January 2023 which was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and is available on www.sedarplus.ca. The production targets for the PLS Project are based on qualifying foreign estimates, being mineral resource estimates that are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code. A competent person has not done sufficient work to classify the foreign qualifying estimates as Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves in accordance with the JORC Code and it is uncertain that following evaluation and/or further exploration work, the qualifying foreign estimates will be able to be reported as Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves in accordance with the JORC Code. All material assumptions underpinning these targets, or the forecast financial information derived from these targets, continue to apply and have not materially changed.
3 Operating cash cost is inclusive of mining, processing and site-based G&A and services, exclusive of net-smelter return payments.
4 Cost estimate converted to United States Dollars (US$) from Canadian Dollars (C$) at US$0.75:C$1.
5 AISC is equal to operating cash costs plus life of mine sustaining capital costs.
6 Pre-production capital cost inclusive of contingency.
7 US$90.0/lb uranium price assumption is approximately equal to US$90.9/lb, or the simple average of real, Q2 2025 long-term spot and term price forecasts from Trade Tech / UxC during forecast PLS operations 2031-2040.
8 Subject to seasonal limitations / weather windows (i.e. Saskatchewan winters), unforeseen provincial and federal regulatory permitting outcomes and investment approvals.
9 Fission Uranium Corp.’s technical report titled “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report, for PLS Property” with an effective date of 17 January 2023 which was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.
10 Sustaining Capital Cost exclusive of closure costs.
11 The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates for the PLS Project are qualifying foreign estimates that have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument NI 43-101 and the CIM Standards. They are not reported in accordance with the JORC Code. A competent person has not done sufficient work to classify the foreign qualifying estimates as Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves in accordance with the JORC Code and it is uncertain that following evaluation and/or further exploration work, the qualifying foreign estimates will be able to be reported as Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves in accordance with the JORC Code.
12 For completeness, indicated and inferred mineral resource totals for PLS presented in the 2025 Annual Report differ from the aforementioned technical report due to an updated mineral resource estimates at the R840W zone in May 2023 and the R1515W zone in June 2025, which are considered non-material.
13 Corporate tax rate of 27%.
14 Payback period measured from the start of operations, inclusive of ramp-up period.
15 Current average uranium spot price is US$74.48/lb published by Trade Tech and UxC on 25 August 2025 and average uranium long-term price is US$81.00/lb published by Trade Tech and UxC on 31 July 2025.
16 Uranium price of US$65/lb U3O8 assumed in the Fission Uranium Corp.’s “Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report, for PLS Property” with an effective date of 17 January 2023 which was prepared in accordance with NI 43-101.
– Published by The MIL Network
Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-NZ-AU)
PERTH, Australia, Aug. 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Paladin Energy Ltd (ASX:PDN, TSX:PDN, OTCQX:PALAF) (Paladin or the Company) advises that it has released its 2025 Annual Report (including its Financial Report for the year ended 30 June 2025) and management discussion and analysis (MD&A) for Paladin Energy Ltd and its controlled entities for the three and twelve month periods ended 30 June 2025 (FY2025 Financial Results).
The Company has also released an accompanying presentation on the FY2025 Financial Results, and its Corporate Governance Statement and Appendix 4G.
These documents are available on Paladin’s website (https://www.paladinenergy.com.au/investors/asx-announcements/).
For further information contact:
About Paladin
Paladin Energy Ltd (ASX:PDN TSX: PDN OTCQX:PALAF) is a globally significant independent uranium producer with a 75% ownership of the world-class long life Langer Heinrich Mine located in Namibia. In late 2024 the Company acquired Fission Uranium Corp. in Canada, resulting in a dual-listing on the both the ASX and TSX. With the integration of Fission’s operations, the Company now owns and operates an extensive portfolio of uranium development and exploration assets across Canada, which include the Patterson Lake South (PLS) project in Saskatchewan and the Michelin project in Newfoundland and Labrador. Paladin also owns uranium exploration assets in Australia. Through its Langer Heinrich Mine, Paladin is delivering a reliable uranium supply to major nuclear utilities around the world, positioning itself as a meaningful contributor to baseload energy provision in multiple countries and contributing to global decarbonisation.
– Published by The MIL Network
Source: New Zealand Government
Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today.
Thank you to Dan Wildy for the kind invitation and for the hard work you do to keep this institute alive while balancing your day job at New Zealand Police.
I’m sorry I couldn’t be with you in person today. However, it is comforting to know that our intelligence professionals come together like this to share ideas and update each other on best practice. I say that because there has probably never been a time when your work is more in demand.
For a long time, intelligence insights from professionals like you, have been a key source of information and insight for decision makers like me.
You have enjoyed a monopoly on the best tradecraft; you have had the best relationships with overseas partners; and the best access to specialised technology from which to draw your insights.
It is fair to say that there are signs that monopoly is beginning to crumble.
Intelligence professionals are now competing in a highly contested information environment where there is some very interesting work happening in the open source.
My colleagues and I as decision makers rely on your hard work to cut through the noise by giving us clear, impactful and credible insights on the things that truly matter.
I am fortunate that I to get to read rich and impactful intelligence across all of my portfolios.
You can count me as a happy customer, but I’m not the only one that can benefit from your insights.
A key challenge for you is to understand how to use your insights to support a wider range of New Zealanders: from the private sector, to critical infrastructure operators, to community organisations.
These groups all make decisions that can have implications for our national security.
How can you provide actionable intelligence and guidance that organisations and citizens can actually use?
There will always be intelligence that is too sensitive to be shared broadly.
No one is expecting you to relinquish the Crown jewels, but there’s an opportunity to find a balance.
How you engage as intelligence professionals is crucial to ensuring New Zealanders have confidence that you are focused on what matters to support our nation’s prosperity and security.
Another key challenge is to understand how innovation and technology can support this endeavour.
New Zealanders need you to stay ahead of the threats. That’s not going to happen without an innovation mindset and embracing the technological solutions that can help us solve our biggest problems.
Today I will share my thoughts on these challenges, to hopefully set the scene for some of your discussions today.
Implementing the national security strategy
This Government is focused on ensuring a secure and resilient New Zealand- one that is protected as a free, open, and democratic society for future generations.
This is the vision outlined in our national security strategy.
The strategy sets out three priorities:
As Minister of the NZSIS and GCSB, Defence, and Space, I’m lucky to see the great work happening in this area.
We are achieving some wins, and I think you can help us drive further change.
Acting early
The first priority is acting early.
Intelligence insights are absolutely crucial to helping the national security system, and the country as a whole, to act early on a range of threats.
I see this regularly in the reports that come across my desk.
In the cyber-security space the sooner we become aware of and take action against a threat, the stronger our defences are.
The National Cyber Security Centre’s Malware Free Networks, or MFN capability, is an excellent example of how early access to intelligence gives us the awareness needed to protect New Zealanders.
MFN has disrupted more than 500 million threats since it started operating in 2021.
If that’s not a success story for intelligence then I don’t know what is.
But there is the potential to deliver even greater impact.
There is some excellent thinking underway across the national security system about how we act earlier to disrupt the capabilities of these malicious actors and legally prevent them from striking in the first place.
When it comes to countering violent extremism, early intelligence insights are supporting efforts to disengage individuals from a radicalisation pathway.
The next step is to think about ways we can disrupt individuals when they are first engaging in violent extremist propaganda.
In order to stay ahead of the threats, the intelligence and security agencies need to do more than just collect intelligence and provide protective security advice.
What if the NZSIS was able to covertly divert an individual in some way? Or encourage a potential violent extremist to seek help and support? We could achieve an even greater impact.
In the murky world of foreign interference and espionage, early intelligence insights and protective security advice help prepare government officials and the private sector to visit countries where they may be targeted.
These insights can also support communities who are being targeted by transnational repression activities such as surveillance or harassment.
The new foreign interference legislation currently before the House will send a message to foreign state actors that this behaviour is unacceptable in New Zealand. It will also make it harder for them to operate here.
Working together domestically and internationally
The second priority from the strategy is about domestic and international collaboration.
We’ve seen significant advances from this intelligence community to make your insights more accessible to a broader audience of New Zealanders.
I may be biased as their Minister, but both the GCSB and the NZSIS have been shining lights in this regard- for example the GCSB’s annual Cyber Threat Report and the NZSIS’s Threat Environment Report.
I would like to congratulate the Service for publishing another excellent document last week.
This report brings these threats to life through clear descriptions of what we face and case studies based on actual activities that have been observed over the past year to 18 months.
There are some challenging issues in the report that will need to be addressed by our broader society.
It’s about time these conversations were normalised and for more people to understand why our national security is worthy of attention.
There is an attitude in some quarters that security and economic growth are somehow in competition with each other.
That couldn’t be further from the truth. You can’t have prosperity without security, and you can’t have security without prosperity.
In my space portfolio, we talk about growth and security in the same conversations.
We attract investment into this sector not only because we have brilliant people and technology, but also because we’re a safe place to do business with an enabling regulatory system and strong security provisions.
The most recent example of this is the ground-based space infrastructure legislation I recently passed in Parliament.
To be attractive to potential investors, New Zealand needs to show we can protect our IP and those of our customers.
That’s why I’m glad to see the NZSIS and GCSB raising awareness about the threat of foreign interference, espionage and cyber attacks. This is encouraging much more mature conversations about identifying threats and managing risk.
I would like to see these conversations taking place in boardrooms across the country, but particularly in our technology and research sectors.
If we don’t take security seriously enough, it will be a foreign state actor benefiting from our leading edge innovation, not New Zealand.
To foster collective understanding we must also focus on the work you do with our international partners.
I know those relationships are strong and I know they are vital.
You as intelligence professionals are well regarded, particularly within our most important relationship with the Five Eyes intelligence partnership.
We receive tremendous value from these relationships, but I know we contribute significant value too.
That’s why it is so galling to hear commentary that questions the value of our Five Eyes participation or claims that it interferes with our independent foreign policy.
Nothing could be further from the truth, and frankly it is time people grew up. We remain firmly in charge of our own destiny. In fact, our Five Eyes relationships help us to maintain our independence. When we receive good intelligence, we make good decisions.
I think it is time we talked more about the kind of value we receive.
It is as simple as this: our membership of the Five Eyes intelligence partnership contributes to the safety and security of New Zealand each and every day.
Being part of the Five Eyes gives us access to capabilities that help to disrupt drug flows. It helps us counter violent extremist, terrorist and foreign interference threats. It keeps us in the fight on espionage and cyber attacks.
Any cooperation with Five Eyes partners is always on our own terms. It needs to be done in accordance with our own laws and priorities, and our sovereign decision-making abilities are maintained throughout.
I think there are plenty of reasons for New Zealanders to have trust and confidence in these relationships.
The debate misses the real point – our security and prosperity, now and into the future.
Thank you for the work you do as intelligence professionals to keep our Five Eyes relationships so strong.
Adopting an integrated approach
I will finish with the third priority from the national security strategy: adopting an integrated approach.
Because of our size, we can only achieve the scale we need by working together and sharing resources across government.
New Zealand risks being left behind by the fast-moving world of artificial intelligence if we don’t look at how to achieve greater technological integration.
It’s important to get the transition to AI right, but we also can’t afford to muck around.
From a security and intelligence perspective, AI is important for three reasons:
I am pleased that your agencies have work underway in these areas, but it would be even better if we went faster, if we were more joined up, and if we better leveraged private sector capabilities.
There is no point undertaking this work within our agencies’ silos – an integrated approach will make us both stronger and safer.
If you were after a challenging and rewarding career, you have come to the right place.
There are some incredible opportunities to deliver credible, impactful and actionable intelligence that has the potential to make a real difference. You are excellent at countering threats but let’s consider how you can disrupt threats too.
You are lucky enough to work with the best of the best both here in New Zealand and alongside your international partners.
My message to you is to make the most of those opportunities and always strive for better.
Thank you for keeping us well informed and for the great work you do to keep New Zealand safe and secure.
Source: New Zealand Government
Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee today announced proposed changes to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012, and says the focus is on restoring fairness and practicality to the system without compromising public safety.
“Most New Zealanders who choose to drink alcohol do so responsibly. Our reforms recognise that responsible drinkers should not be penalised because of the behaviour of a few who do not drink safely,” Mrs McKee says.
“The Government is making targeted reforms to alcohol legislation to remove unnecessary red tape while continuing to uphold protections that minimise alcohol-related harm.
The package aims to improve how the law operates in practice, removing compliance burdens that don’t meaningfully reduce harm, while strengthening areas where regulation can have a real impact.
Key changes include:
“These are practical changes that maintain the core objective of the Act – minimising alcohol-related harm – while recognising that regulation must also be proportionate and workable,” Mrs McKee says.
The reforms also reflect growing consumer demand for non-intoxicating alternatives. Licensed premises will be required to offer a wider range of zero- and/or low-alcohol beverages, and outdated definitions in the Act will be updated to reflect modern products and preferences.
“People deserve to have choices, including the choice to enjoy a drink responsibly, or to opt for non-alcoholic alternatives that suit their lifestyle. The current rules around non-alcoholic options are overly restrictive and don’t reflect how people actually drink today,” Mrs McKee says.
Mrs McKee stressed that territorial authorities will retain all current powers to regulate alcohol within their communities through Local Alcohol Policies and District Licensing Committees.
“I trust local councils to make the right decisions for their communities. If people have concerns about alcohol in their area, they should raise them directly with their council, and many already do.”
“These changes strike a careful balance: they make life fairer for responsible drinkers and honest businesses, while continuing to target the areas where alcohol misuse can cause real harm,” Mrs McKee says.
Cabinet decided to
Source: New Zealand Police
Police acknowledge the findings of the Independent Police Conduct Authority in relation to the actions of two officers during an arrest.
On 17 September 2023, Police approached a man (identified only as Mr X) who was sitting in the drivers seat, to request his name and address.
One of the officers reached into the vehicle to remove the car keys from the ignition.
Mr X has tried to stop the officer, resulting in an altercation ending in his arrest.
The IPCA found the officers were justified in speaking to Mr X and requesting his details, and their use of force during the altercation was justified as self-defence.
However, the Authority found that Police were not justified in removing the keys under the Land Transport Act 1998.
Acting Waikato District Commander Superintendent Scott Gemmell say Police investigated and self-referred the matter to the IPCA.
“Our staff experience unpredictable behaviour from people we encounter every day, and the officers made decisions and acted based on the circumstances as the incident unfolded.”
ENDS
Source: New Zealand Transport Agency
Top of the South drivers are being urged to cool down, calm down, and slow down when driving through road work sites.
Rob Service, System Manager Nelson/Tasman says with multiple parts of the state highway network needing repairs following the winter floods, contractors are seeing some unsafe behaviour from people driving through road works.
“We completely understand that drivers have places to go and people to see, and that having to slow down for road works can be frustrating.”
“However, that is no excuse for speeding and breaking temporary speed limits,” Mr Service says.
He says it is a huge safety risk for road crews.
“Live traffic lanes are incredibly dangerous, and our crews are often just centimetres away from them. It only takes a tiny mistake to have horrendous consequences. Temporary speed limits are there for a reason, please respect them,” Mr Service says.
His view is shared by Acting Inspector Chris Brooks, Tasman District Road Policing Manager NZ Police, who says a lot of crashes Police see are due to people not driving to the conditions.
“This doesn’t just apply to weather; it also includes when roads are not operating at 100 percent.”
“Dangerous driving of any kind, including not adhering to the speed limit – whether it be temporary or otherwise – is taken very seriously by Police, and following road works signage and speed limits through these areas is essential in keeping yourself, other drivers, and workers on site safe,” Mr Brooks says.
Mr Service says safety is key but, so too, is protecting damaged sections of the highway to ensure they do not degrade further.
“For example, on State Highway 60 Tākaka Hill we have six separate sites we need to fix. Some of these are vulnerable underslips where unsafe driving and excessive speed creates a real risk of worse damage occurring.”
“We have already had to introduce a pilot vehicle on the Drummond’s slip site to keep traffic speeds down. This just adds unnecessary time and expense to the job. Damaging the road further means we will have to work there for longer and spend more money”, Mr Service says.
Mr Service says drivers also need to keep their cool when they’re delayed at road work sites.
“We are getting anecdotal reports of issues from our contractors. Please realise our crews are doing their best to fix the road so you can get where you are going.”
We ask they be respected. We treat any incidents of abusive or aggressive behaviour very seriously and will report them to the Police.”
Acting Inspector Brooks agrees, saying aggression and abuse towards road workers is unacceptable.
“It’s honestly disappointing to hear that this has become an issue – please remember that this is someone’s mum, dad, son, or daughter working at these sites.”
“We urge the public to report any dangerous driving matters or abuse, by calling 111 if it is happening now, or through our 105 channels if it is after the fact,” he says.
With the summer road works season about to get underway in October both NZTA/Waka Kotahi and NZ Police are encouraging drivers to do the right thing – respect road workers, respect speed limits, and make sure they drive safely on the roads.
Watch the keeping safe around roadworks video:
[embedded content]
Source: New Zealand Government
The Rail Heritage Trust of New Zealand will receive an increased annual contribution to support its restoration efforts of rail heritage buildings and structures, Rail Minister Winston Peters announced today.
“This is about our national industrial heritage and the volunteer power and engineering pride of railway communities,” Mr Peters says.
“Only fools steam ahead without any knowledge of where they have been, and communities that value their past are not fools.
“KiwiRail has a small amount of funding for public good initiatives like rail safety campaigns, helping the public enjoy historic steam locomotives and carriages access on the network, and minor infrastructure works for community benefit.
“We requested KiwiRail’s board consider increasing its public good investment in heritage and were pleased to hear from new Chair Sue Tindal that they have increased the annual contribution to the Trust from $125,000 to $500,000.
“The Trust has restored many railway buildings, including the famous Cass railway station, as depicted in the painting by Rita Angus. The Trust has a long list of valued sites which they want to support with local financial and volunteer backing.
“Discussions are underway to transfer ownership of the historic Mataura Railway Station from KiwiRail to the Trust, with this funding increase enabling its restoration with the support of local volunteers and donors. This project has been at an impasse for too long, and we have heard the provincial champions who have worked hard to see it restored so we are fixing it.
“Resolving another neglected heritage site, KiwiRail is repairing the historic rail footbridge at Moana on the West Coast and is in discussion with the Trust about it taking responsibility the for the bridge’s ongoing upkeep,” Mr Peters says.
Source: Education Review Office
New research from the Education Review Office has found how we can provide our teachers with better professional development.
Source: Advanced Recycling Conference
Alongside core-topics like plastics and polymer recycling, this year’s program explores new developments in biochemical, textile and automotive recycling, plus digital tools supporting scalable solutions for circular systems.
On 19-20 November 2025, the Advanced Recycling Conference (ARC) in Cologne, Germany, once more unites industry leaders, technology providers, researchers, innovators, and policy-makers to address urgent recycling challenges in various waste-streams. Alongside core-topics like plastics and polymer recycling, this year’s event places strong emphasis on pollution-intensive sectors like textile and automotive, that pose significant environmental problems due to their complex material streams. While textile recycling rates in the EU remain below 20 %, hindered by difficult fibre blends, automotive plastics and rubbers face regulatory pressure and material complexity under the End-of-Life Vehicle Directive.
To address these challenges, ARC 2025 spotlights four new focus areas: biochemical recycling, textile and automotive recycling, and advanced digital tools such as AI-enabled sorting, traceability systems, and process optimisation for scale up. These solutions complement established recycling methods across physical processes (extrusion, dissolution), chemical recycling (solvolysis), and thermochemical techniques (pyrolysis, thermal depolymerisation, gasification), as well as carbon capture and utilisation (CCU), that remain key-elements of the ARC program.
At ARC 2025, attendees will gain valuable insights into the latest technological developments, regulatory frameworks, and market conditions shaping the future of advanced recycling and the circular economy. Putting partnership at centre, the event facilitates collaboration and informed decision-making across sectors and industries, proving that sometimes success is only a handshake away.
Responding to EU recycling targets and industry needs
The conference comes at a critical time when significant changes in recycling target across several legislations are taking place. For example, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation introduced quotas for 2030 of recycled post-consumer plastic ranging from 10 % to 35 % for different packaging plastics which should be increased by 2040. Moreover, the End-of-Life Vehicle Proposal includes a mandate for a minimum of 25 % recycled plastic in new vehicles, which, if approved, can considerably increase the demand of recycled post-consumer plastic. Meeting these targets demands the deployment and implementation of innovative recycling technologies and expansion of necessary infrastructure. The event will therefore also address regulatory impacts, market dynamics, and environmental considerations.
Full conference programme now available
Packed with international expertise, ARC 2025 features experts from a broad range of sectors and industries, e.g., BASF, Covestro, Evonik, Fluor, Green Dot, ISCC, LEGO, LyondellBasell, NFIA, Siemens, Sulzer, Trinseo, Vaude, but also research and academic institutions like Chalmers University of Technology, Fraunhofer IVV, Research Centre Jülich, Recycario Data Science – Institut for Economic Plastics Recycling and TU Bergakademie Freiberg (Institute of Energy Process Engineering and Chemical Engineering).
While putting a focus on plastics and polymers, the programme provides a comprehensive overview in different focus-sessions:
Advanced Recycling as a Pillar of Renewable Carbon and its Challenges
Thermochemical Recycling
Biochemical Recycling
Textile Sorting and Recycling
From Py-Oil Quality to Valuable Resources and the Chain of Custody in Advanced Recycling
Recycling Solutions for End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV)
Sustainable Polymers
Thermochemical Solutions for the Recovery of Valuable Resources and Energy
Physical Recycling via Dissolution.
The full conference program is available at https://advanced-recycling.eu/program/.
The Advanced Recycling Conference provides a unique platform for technology providers, waste management companies, brands, investors, policymakers, and scientists to exchange knowledge, build partnerships, and advance towards circular value chains.
ARC 2025 is supported by visionary sponsors, dedicated to advancing circular solutions. nova-Institute thanks Gold Sponsor Siemens and Bronze sponsors BUSS ChemTech, Erema Group and Starlinger.
The Advanced Recycling Conference is supported by industry and trade associations, non- profit organisations, research institutions and interest groups that are thematically linked to the conference: BCNP Consultants (DE), C.A.R.M.E.N. (DE), ChemCologne (DE), Chemical Recycling Europe (EU), Chemie-Cluster Bayern (DE), CLIB (DE), IBB Netzwerk (DE), ITA – International Centre for Sustainable Textiles (DE), kunststoffland.NRW (DE), Plastics Europe (DE), Renewable Carbon Initiative (International).
For detailed information and registration, visit https://advanced-recycling.eu/
nova-Institut GmbH has been working in the field of sustainability since the mid-1990s and focuses today primarily on the topic of renewable carbon cycles (recycling, bioeconomy and CO2utilisation/CCU).
As an independent research institute, nova supports in particular customers in chemical, plastics and materials industries with the transformation from fossil to renewable carbon from biomass, direct CO2utilisation and recycling.
Both in the accompanying research of international innovation projects and in individual, scientifically based management consulting, a multidisciplinary team of scientists at nova deals with the entire range of topics from renewable raw materials, technologies and markets, economics, political framework conditions, life cycle assessments and sustainability to communication, target groups and strategy development.
50 experts from various disciplines are working together on the defossilization of the industry and for a climate neutral future. More information at: nova-institute.eu – renewable-carbon.eu