Home Blog Page 914

$14 million boost for sports facilities across Tāmaki Makaurau from Auckland Council

0

Source: Auckland Council

A top-of-the-line climbing structure for Auckland tamariki and rangatahi to use and enjoy is one step closer thanks to Auckland Council’s Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund.

Six sports organisations across Tāmaki Makaurau will receive a slice of more than $14.3 million from the council to help develop their facilities to meet the sport and recreation needs of Aucklanders now and in the future.

Councillor Angela Dalton, chair of the Community Committee, says she’s pleased the council is able to help sports organisations build for the future.

“Auckland Council has allocated substantial funding to a variety of sporting organisations across the region, so they can grow and enhance their facilities.

“Having quality, fit for purpose facilities will ultimately allow Aucklanders from all walks of life to participate in sport and recreation, stay active and connect.

“Non-council owned facilities are crucial to the Tāmaki Makaurau sport and recreation facility network as they meet the region’s evolving demands for sporting opportunities.”

Waka Pacific Trust was allocated $250,000 for shading and lighting of the climbing frame to be built at Vector Wero Whitewater Park in Manukau. The galvanised steel structure will rise 16 metres, comprise 78 climbing elements ranging in difficulty levels. It will host up to 100 participants at once, offering a fun and active challenge. The Trust’s school programme which supported 90,000 children free of charge in 2024 – 80 per cent from low-decile schools – aims to provide free access to 15,000 local children in Wero Climb’s first year, with 9,000 already registered to have a go.

The council has previously contributed $250,000 to this $3.1 million project through the same fund.

The other organisations allocated funding include Auckland Hockey Association, Highbrook Regional Watersports Centre Trust, Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei Whai Maia, Pakuranga United Rugby Club (to expand their community sports centre), Waka Pacific Trust and West Auckland Riding for the Disabled.

“It’s fantastic to have these investment decisions made by our elected members,” says Kenneth Aiolupotea, General Manager Community Wellbeing.

“The next step involves our team working closely with successful grant applicants to build their sports and recreational infrastructure that will benefit our communities across Tāmaki Makaurau. This is very exciting.”

How funding is allocated

Six organisations were invited to submit updated information regarding their on-going projects. These projects were identified based on their alignment to the priority criteria for the fund and progress through the project lifecycle.

Auckland Council staff and an independent review panel considered the submissions and assessed the capability of the organisations, achievability of the project, current project status, and funding status.

All six of the targeted process projects were recommended to receive grants for a total of $14,348,920. The funding was approved by the council’s Community Committee on 11 February 2025.

More information on the council’s grants programme that supports Aucklanders’ aspirations for a great city, including the Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund can be found on the Auckland Council website.

Next funding round

Applications for the Sport and Recreational Facilities Investment Fund, contestable process opens on 18 February 2025 and closes on 18 March 2025.

Sport and Recreation Facilities Investment Fund, targeted process 2025/2026

Recipient

Project title

Funding up to:

Auckland Hockey Association Incorporated

Lloyd Elsmore Park Hockey Stadium – Turf 2 renewal and LED Flood-light upgrade

$215,000

Highbrook Regional Watersport Centre Trust

Highbrook Watersports Centre Clubhouse building

$2,200,000

Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei Whai Maia Limited acting on behalf of Whai Maia Charitable Trust 1

Ngāti Whātua Ōrakei Sports, Recreation and Hauora Centre

$5,000,000

Pakuranga United Rugby Club Incorporated

Howick Pakuranga Community Sports Centre Facility Expansion

$5,571,061

Waka Pacific Trust

Wero Climb

$250,000

West Auckland Riding for the Disabled Association Incorporated

Covered Riding Facility

$512,859

                                                                      Total

$14,348, 920

MIL OSI

Universities – Deep dive on deep-water reefs finds new marine species – Vic

0
Source: Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington

Marine researchers from Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington have discovered a species of sea squirt that is thought to be new to science.

The sea squirt was found off Rakiura Stewart Island while the researchers were exploring marine communities that live on the area’s deep-water reefs.

“We were off Port Pegasus at the southern end of Rakiura and we could see all these really unusual ‘egg’ shapes on the seafloor. Closer inspection revealed they were large, 30 cm tall sea squirts that we haven’t found in any other part of Aotearoa,” said Professor James Bell, a marine biologist at the university.

Marine ecologist Mike Page, an emeritus scientist from the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, confirmed the sea squirt is likely to be a new species that is yet to be named.

Sea squirts, also known as ascidians, play a key role in maintaining water quality. They are filter feeders—creatures that feed on nutrients in the water column.

“Unusually, sea squirts dominated the marine communities on the deep-water reefs that we explored off Stewart Island. We typically find sponges are the dominant player on deep-water reefs in other parts of the country,” said Professor Bell.

The new species of sea squirt was found at a depth of 115 metres.

“The water off Stewart Island was really clear down at this depth. This probably reflects the fact there are no major rivers draining into the sea and there are still large areas of native forest on the island.”

Video footage of the reefs shows many different species of sea squirt, varying in colour from bright white to pinks, blues, and yellows.

The footage was taken using a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) that can film in waters of more than 100 m deep.

“Finding this sea squirt is a reminder that we still have so much to learn about the rich diversity of life in the ocean. It’s also a reminder of the need to ensure we protect our marine environment and the unique species it supports,” said Professor Bell.

The ROV used by the researchers to collect video footage was purchased with funding from the George Mason Charitable Trust.

MIL OSI

NZ-AU: IREN Reports Q2 FY25 Results

0

Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-NZ-AU)

Record Revenue, $53.7m Operating Cashflow, $18.9m NPAT

75MW Liquid-Cooled Childress Data Center for AI / HPC (“Horizon 1”)

Developing New 600MW Sweetwater 2 Site

SYDNEY, Feb. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — IREN Limited (NASDAQ: IREN) (together with its subsidiaries, “IREN” or “the Company”), today reported its financial results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2024. All $ amounts are in United States Dollars (“USD”) unless otherwise stated.

“We are pleased to report our Q2 FY25 results with record revenue and operating cashflow,” said Daniel Roberts, Co-Founder and Co-CEO of IREN. “The strategic investments we have made in scale and efficiency are starting to flow through to our earnings and we expect this momentum to continue.”

“We are also excited to announce transformative growth initiatives across the business. Firstly, Horizon 1, which is a new 75MW direct-to-chip liquid cooling deployment at Childress for AI / HPC. Secondly, developing a new 600MW Sweetwater 2 site located ~28 miles from our existing Sweetwater 1 project, expected to create a 2GW data center hub.”

Key Growth Initiatives

Horizon 1 – 75MW Liquid-Cooled Childress Data Center

  • 75MW gross (50MW IT load)
  • Direct-to-chip liquid cooling, power redundancy
  • Designed to support NVIDIA Blackwell (200kW rack density)
  • Strong commercial rationale
    • Scarcity of liquid-cooled data center capacity coupled with increasing demand from NVIDIA Blackwell coming to market
    • Construction plan providing enhanced delivery certainty for customers
  • Focused on multi-tenant AI colocation opportunities
  • Target completion H2 2025

Sweetwater 2 – new 600MW site, expected to create a 2GW Sweetwater Data Center Hub

  • Finalizing 600MW grid-connection agreement
  • Grid network studies complete
  • >500 acres of land secured
  • Located near existing Sweetwater 1 (~28 miles) and Abilene (~39 miles)
  • Design work underway for direct fiber loop between Sweetwater 1 and 2
  • Focused on highest value monetization pathways
    • Prioritizing whole-of-site, single tenant opportunities
    • Flexibility to bootstrap with Bitcoin mining
  • Sweetwater 1 energization on-track for April 2026 (1.4GW)
  • Sweetwater 2 energization expected in 2028 (600MW)

Expand Bitcoin mining from 31 EH/s to 52 EH/s

  • Large-scale operations
    • 31 EH/s installed
    • 50 EH/s expansion on-track for H1 2025
    • Horizon 1 adjusts prior expansion plan from 57 EH/s to 52 EH/s
    • Large sites, delivering economies of scale
  • Low-cost production
    • 15 J/TH fleet efficiency (current)
    • 3 c/kWh Childress power price (since transition to spot pricing)
    • ~75% hardware profit margin (January 2025)1

Corporate & Funding

  • US domestic issuer status confirmed to be adopted from H2 2025
  • Growth funding via convertible note proceeds, ATM facility, reinvesting operating cashflows, along with continued evaluation of additional funding structures
  • Prioritizing acceleration of new strategic growth initiatives and deferring consideration of potential investor distributions
  • The Q2 FY25 Results webcast will be recorded, and the replay will be accessible shortly after the event at https://iren.com/investor/events-and-presentations

Second Quarter FY25 Results

  • 129% increase in Bitcoin mining revenue of $113.5 million ($49.6 million in Q1 FY25), driven by growth in operating hashrate and higher Bitcoin prices during the quarter
  • 1,347 Bitcoin mined (813 Bitcoin in Q1 FY25), driven by growth in operating hashrate during the quarter
  • Net electricity costs remained relatively flat at $28.9 million ($28.7 million in Q1 FY25), despite 85% increase in average operating hashrate during the quarter, primarily due to Childress energy spot pricing strategy implemented on August 1, 2024
    • 39% decrease in net electricity cost per Bitcoin mined from $35,359 to $21,418
  • Other costs of $25.1 million ($21.4 million in Q1 FY25)
    • Primarily driven by $1.7 million increase in construction and operational insurance related to expansion at Childress
    • Reflects a business today that is delivering significant growth, and projecting continued expansion over the coming years
  • Adjusted EBITDA of $62.6 million ($2.6 million in Q1 FY25)
  • Net profit after income tax of $18.9 million (loss of $51.7 million in Q1 FY25)
  • Operating cash inflow of $53.7 million (cash outflow of $3.8 million in Q1 FY25)
  • Cash and cash equivalents of $427.3 million as of December 31, 2024
  • $440 million convertible note issued on December 6, 2024

Assumptions and Notes

  1. Reflects 75% hardware profit margin for the month of January 2025, calculated as Bitcoin mining revenue less Bitcoin mining electricity costs, divided by Bitcoin mining revenue and excluding all other costs.

Non-IFRS metric reconciliation

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation
(USD$m)1
3 months ended
Dec 31, 2024
3 months ended
Sep 30, 2024
Bitcoin mining revenue 113.5 49.6
AI cloud service revenue 2.7 3.2
Other income2 0.3
Net electricity costs3 (28.9) (28.7)
Other costs4 (25.1) (21.4)
Adjusted EBITDA 62.6 2.6
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 52% 5%
     
Reconciliation to consolidated statement of profit or loss    
Add/(deduct):    
Unrealized gain on financial asset 12.9
Share-based payment expense – $75 exercise price options (3.0) (3.1)
Share-based payment expense – other (4.9) (5.1)
Impairment of assets (9.5)
Reversal of impairment of assets 0.5
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) (4.6) 1.2
Other non-recurring income5 1.7
Gain/(loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment (0.7) 0.8
Other expense items6 (1.7) (5.6)
EBITDA 62.7 (18.6)
Finance expense (6.3) (0.1)
Interest income 1.6 2.3
Depreciation (36.2) (34.0)
Loss before income tax expense for the period 21.9 (50.4)
Income tax expense (3.0) (1.3)
Loss after income tax expense for the period 18.9 (51.7)

 

1)  For further detail, see our unaudited interim financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2024, included in our Form 6-K filed with the SEC on February 12, 2025.
2)  Other income excludes ERS revenue which is included in Net electricity costs and other non-recurring income as described in footnote 5.
3)  Net electricity costs is a non-IFRS metric. See below table for a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS metric.
4)   Other costs include employee benefits expense, professional fees, site expenses, Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) and other operating expenses excluding other expense items as described in footnote 6.
5)  Other non-recurring income includes insurance proceeds relating to the theft of mining hardware in transit.
6)  Other expense items include a one-off liquidation payment incurred in August 2024 resulting from the transition to spot pricing at the Group’s site at Childress, the reversal of the unrealized loss recorded on fixed price contracted amounts outstanding at June 30, 2024, one-off professional fees incurred in relation to litigation matters, loss on theft of miners in transit and transaction costs incurred in December 2024 on entering the capped call transactions in conjunction with the issuance of the 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030.

    

Reconciliation of Electricity charges to Net electricity costs
(USD$m)
3 months ended
Dec 31, 2024
3 months ended
Sep 30, 2024
Electricity charges (30.2) (29.8)
Add/(deduct) the following:    
Realized gain/(loss) on financial asset (4.2)
One off liquidation payment (included in Realized gain/(loss) on financial asset)1 7.2
Reversal of unrealized loss (included in Realized gain/(loss) on financial asset)2 (3.4)
ERS revenue (included in Other income) 1.4 1.6
ERS fees (included in Other operating expenses) (0.1) (0.1)
Net electricity costs3 (28.9) (28.7)
Bitcoin mined 1,347 813
Net electricity costs per Bitcoin mined ($’000) (21.4) (35.4)
1)  One-off liquidation payment includes the amount paid to exit positions previously entered into under a fixed price and fixed quantity contract, on transition to a spot price and actual usage contract.
2)   Reversal of unrealized loss is calculated as the unrealized loss on financial asset as at June 30, 2024.
3) Net electricity costs exclude the cost of RECs of $(1.4)m for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and $(0.6)m for the three months ended September 30, 2024.
   

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or IREN’s future financial or operating performance. For example, forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the Company’s business strategy, expected operational and financial results, and expected increase in power capacity and hashrate. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “may,” “can,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “project,” “strive,” “budget,” “forecast,” “expect,” “intend,” “target”, “will,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “scheduled” or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terminology, but the absence of these words does not mean that statement is not forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements or information that refer to expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, performance or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking.

These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause IREN’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward looking statements, including, but not limited to: Bitcoin price and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; IREN’s ability to obtain additional capital on commercially reasonable terms and in a timely manner to meet its capital needs and facilitate its expansion plans; the terms of any future financing or any refinancing, restructuring or modification to the terms of any future financing, which could require IREN to comply with onerous covenants or restrictions, and its ability to service its debt obligations, any of which could restrict its business operations and adversely impact its financial condition, cash flows and results of operations; IREN’s ability to successfully execute on its growth strategies and operating plans, including its ability to continue to develop its existing data center sites, including to design and deploy direct-to-chip liquid cooling systems, and to diversify and expand into the market for high performance computing (“HPC”) solutions it may offer (including the market for cloud services (“AI Cloud Services”) and potential colocation services; IREN’s limited experience with respect to new markets it has entered or may seek to enter, including the market for HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services); expectations with respect to the ongoing profitability, viability, operability, security, popularity and public perceptions of the Bitcoin network; expectations with respect to the profitability, viability, operability, security, popularity and public perceptions of any current and future HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services) that IREN offers; IREN’s ability to secure and retain customers on commercially reasonable terms or at all, particularly as it relates to its strategy to expand into markets for HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services); IREN’s ability to manage counterparty risk (including credit risk) associated with any current or future customers, including customers of its HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services) and other counterparties; the risk that any current or future customers, including customers of its HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services), or other counterparties may terminate, default on or underperform their contractual obligations; Bitcoin global hashrate fluctuations; IREN’s ability to secure renewable energy, renewable energy certificates, power capacity, facilities and sites on commercially reasonable terms or at all; delays associated with, or failure to obtain or complete, permitting approvals, grid connections and other development activities customary for greenfield or brownfield infrastructure projects; IREN’s reliance on power and utilities providers, third party mining pools, exchanges, banks, insurance providers and its ability to maintain relationships with such parties; expectations regarding availability and pricing of electricity; IREN’s participation and ability to successfully participate in demand response products and services and other load management programs run, operated or offered by electricity network operators, regulators or electricity market operators; the availability, reliability and/or cost of electricity supply, hardware and electrical and data center infrastructure, including with respect to any electricity outages and any laws and regulations that may restrict the electricity supply available to IREN; any variance between the actual operating performance of IREN’s miner hardware achieved compared to the nameplate performance including hashrate; IREN’s ability to curtail its electricity consumption and/or monetize electricity depending on market conditions, including changes in Bitcoin mining economics and prevailing electricity prices; actions undertaken by electricity network and market operators, regulators, governments or communities in the regions in which IREN operates; the availability, suitability, reliability and cost of internet connections at IREN’s facilities; IREN’s ability to secure additional hardware, including hardware for Bitcoin mining and any current or future HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services) it offers, on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and any delays or reductions in the supply of such hardware or increases in the cost of procuring such hardware; expectations with respect to the useful life and obsolescence of hardware (including hardware for Bitcoin mining as well as hardware for other applications, including any current or future HPC solutions (including AI Cloud Services and potential colocation services) IREN offers); delays, increases in costs or reductions in the supply of equipment used in IREN’s operations; IREN’s ability to operate in an evolving regulatory environment; IREN’s ability to successfully operate and maintain its property and infrastructure; reliability and performance of IREN’s infrastructure compared to expectations; malicious attacks on IREN’s property, infrastructure or IT systems; IREN’s ability to maintain in good standing the operating and other permits and licenses required for its operations and business; IREN’s ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce its intellectual property rights and confidential information; any intellectual property infringement and product liability claims; whether the secular trends IREN expects to drive growth in its business materialize to the degree it expects them to, or at all; any pending or future acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures or other strategic transactions; the occurrence of any environmental, health and safety incidents at IREN’s sites, and any material costs relating to environmental, health and safety requirements or liabilities; damage to IREN’s property and infrastructure and the risk that any insurance IREN maintains may not fully cover all potential exposures; ongoing proceedings relating to the default by two of the Company’s wholly-owned special purpose vehicles under limited recourse equipment financing facilities; ongoing securities litigation relating in part to the default, and any future litigation, claims and/or regulatory investigations, and the costs, expenses, use of resources, diversion of management time and efforts, liability and damages that may result therefrom; IREN’s failure to comply with any laws including the anti-corruption laws of the United States and various international jurisdictions; any failure of IREN’s compliance and risk management methods; any laws, regulations and ethical standards that may relate to IREN’s business, including those that relate to Bitcoin and the Bitcoin mining industry and those that relate to any other services it offers, including laws and regulations related to data privacy, cybersecurity and the storage, use or processing of information and consumer laws; IREN’s ability to attract, motivate and retain senior management and qualified employees; increased risks to IREN’s global operations including, but not limited to, political instability, acts of terrorism, theft and vandalism, cyberattacks and other cybersecurity incidents and unexpected regulatory and economic sanctions changes, among other things; climate change, severe weather conditions and natural and man-made disasters that may materially adversely affect IREN’s business, financial condition and results of operations; public health crises, including an outbreak of an infectious disease and any governmental or industry measures taken in response; IREN’s ability to remain competitive in dynamic and rapidly evolving industries; damage to IREN’s brand and reputation; expectations relating to Environmental, Social or Governance issues or reporting; the costs of being a public company; the increased regulatory and compliance costs of IREN ceasing to be a foreign private issuer and an emerging growth company, as a result of which we will be required, among other things, to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC commencing with our next fiscal year, and we will also be required to prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP rather than IFRS, and to modify certain of our policies to comply with corporate governance practices required of a U.S. domestic issuer; that we do not currently pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares, and may not in the foreseeable future and, accordingly, your ability to achieve a return on your investment in our ordinary shares will depend on appreciation, if any, in the price of our ordinary shares; and other important factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” in IREN’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on August 28, 2024 as such factors may be updated from time to time in its other filings with the SEC, accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and the Investor Relations section of IREN’s website at https://investors.iren.com.

These and other important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this investor update. Any forward-looking statement that IREN makes in this investor update speaks only as of the date of such statement. Except as required by law, IREN disclaims any obligation to update or revise, or to publicly announce any update or revision to, any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Non-IFRS Financial Measures

This press release includes non-IFRS financial measures, including Net electricity costs, hardware profit margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. We provide these measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.

There are a number of limitations related to the use of Net electricity costs, hardware profit margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. For example, other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently. The Company believes that these measures are important and supplement discussions and analysis of its results of operations and enhances an understanding of its operating performance.

EBITDA is calculated as our IFRS profit/(loss) after income tax expense, excluding interest income, finance expense, income tax expense/(benefit) and depreciation, which are important components of our IFRS profit/(loss) after income tax expense. Further, “Adjusted EBITDA” also excludes share-based payments expense, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment of assets, certain other non-recurring income, gain/loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, gain on disposal of subsidiaries, unrealized fair value gains and losses on financial instruments and certain other expense items.

Net electricity costs is calculated as our IFRS Electricity charges, ERS revenue (included in Other income) and ERS fees (included in Other operating expenses) and net of Realized gain/(loss) on financial asset excluding a one-off liquidation payment incurred in August 2024 resulting from the transition to spot pricing at the Group’s site at Childress and the reversal of the unrealized loss recorded on fixed price contracted amounts outstanding at June 30, 2024, and excludes the cost of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs).

Hardware profit margin is calculated Bitcoin mining revenue less Bitcoin mining electricity costs, divided by Bitcoin mining revenue and excluding all other costs.

About IREN

IREN is a leading data center business powering the future of Bitcoin, AI and beyond utilizing 100% renewable energy.

  • Bitcoin Mining: providing security to the Bitcoin network, expanding to 52 EH/s in 2025. Operations since 2019.
  • AI Cloud Services: providing cloud compute to AI customers, 1,896 NVIDIA H100 & H200 GPUs. Operations since 2024.
  • Next-Generation Data Centers: 510MW of operating data centers, expanding to 910MW in 2025. Specifically designed and purpose-built infrastructure for high-performance and power-dense computing applications.
  • Technology: technology stack for performance optimization of AI Cloud Services and Bitcoin Mining operations.
  • Development Portfolio: 2,310MW of grid-connected power secured across North America, >2,000 acre property portfolio and multi-gigawatt development pipeline.
  • 100% Renewable Energy (from clean or renewable energy sources or through the purchase of RECs): targets sites with low-cost & underutilized renewable energy, and supports electrical grids and local communities.

Contacts

Media

Jon Snowball
Sodali & Co
+61 477 946 068
+61 423 136 761

Gillian Roberts
Aircover Communications
+1 818 395 2948
gillian.roberts@aircoverpr.com

Investors

Lincoln Tan
IREN
+61 407 423 395 lincoln.tan@iren.com

 

To keep updated on IREN’s news releases and SEC filings, please subscribe to email alerts at https://iren.com/investor/ir-resources/email-alerts.

– Published by The MIL Network

Finance – Mortgage advisers alarmed at ComCom proposal that will be “shocking for consumers”

0
Source: Finance and Mortgage Advisers Association of New Zealand (FAMNZ)

The Finance and Mortgage Advisers Association of New Zealand (FAMNZ) has revealed recommendations by the Commerce Commission to supposedly “promote price competition and choice for home loans” would in fact be disastrous for consumers.

FAMNZ country manager Leigh Hodgetts revealed the commission has requested mortgage advisers to provide clients with a least three “actual offers” to consider and “to submit multiple applications on behalf of their clients”, or face “government intervention.”

Calling the recommendations a solution looking for a problem, she said any such move would hurt consumers by driving up costs, blowing out application times, and affecting their credit ratings.

“Let me be clear. They are not requesting three quotes, but three actual applications and offers, something unheard of anywhere in the world that I’m aware of.”

“Three lenders all processing applications for the same applicant means they will be spending time and resources for loans they know they will likely never get, while other borrowers will be forced to wait and may even miss out on properties,” she explained.

FAMNZ managing director Peter White AM said it was “bureaucracy gone mad”, and has called on commerce and consumer affairs minister Andrew Bayly to immediately intervene.

“The crazy thing is that nothing is broken.

“Mortgage advisers already promote competition, consumers are increasingly choosing to use advisers, and complaints are almost non-existent.”

He said despite FAMNZ attempting to educate the commission on the way advisers worked for the past year, “they clearly still have no idea and now want to make things worse.

“Furthermore, this requirement puts at risk clients’ credit records, which is simply unacceptable and I believe unethical.”

Ms Hodgetts said while advisers could provide multiple choices of lender where possible, only one application should be submitted at once according to the customer’s needs.

“And in some circumstances, for example with self-employed people, there may only be one option,” she explained.

MIL OSI

Release: Homelessness growing under National

0

Source: New Zealand Labour Party

Housing is going in the wrong direction under National, despite promises to build more houses and reduce the social housing waitlist.

“The Salvation Army State of the Nation 2025 report shows Labour was making good progress in public housing, but that it has ground to a halt under this Government,” Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said.

“The Salvation Army today gave the example of a pregnant woman who sleeps not in a social house or in emergency housing, but in the doorway of the Salvation Army’s Rotorua base – that is a damning indictment of this Government’s housing policies.

“Chris Bishop promised to ‘build enough state and social houses so that there is no social housing waitlist’. Tama Potaka promised to ‘build more social houses than the Labour Government’.

Nicola Willis signed a pledge to increase the number of state houses in Auckland by 1000 a year, which the Prime Minister wrongly said was on track today.

“According to a Letter of Expectation the Housing Minister and Finance Minister sent in August last year, Auckland will lose a net 199 homes in the year to June 2026.  

“It is now clear these promises were never intended to be kept. They’re all full of it.

“The Wellington City Mission says this is the worst they have seen things in living memory.

“Frontline providers say people in genuine need are being prevented from accessing Emergency Housing, just to make the numbers look good.

“To make things worse, we have today learnt the Government has cancelled transitional housing contracts, with no additional funding post June 2025. Ten families in Upper Hutt will soon have nowhere to live.

“It is heartless and cruel for Bishop and Potaka to crow about the money they have saved from their changes to Emergency Housing when pregnant women and families are living on the street.

“This isn’t just about those people who are directly affected. When homelessness goes up the whole country suffers – there is more demand on health services, people are forced into unsafe situations, and kids struggle to learn in school,” Kieran McAnulty said.


Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on FacebookInstagram, and X.

MIL OSI

Going for growth: supermarkets on notice

0

Source: New Zealand Government

The Government is seeking to bolster supermarket competition to deliver a better deal for shoppers, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says.

“Studies have shown that New Zealand shoppers pay more for kitchen staples than their counterparts in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia.

“The market lacks competition with three large entities, two of whom don’t compete in the same island, effectively controlling 82 per cent of the market.

“We need more competition to put downward pressure on prices and deliver a better deal for shoppers.

“The weekly supermarket shop makes up a significant proportion of most people’s weekly budget and contributes massively to their cost of living.

“Therefore, I am determined to remove unnecessary regulatory hurdles that discourage new entrants from entering the market.

“Additional steps could include cracking down on predatory pricing, ensuring all competitors have fair access to products, assisting new entrants to access suitable land and properties for development and assisting them to attract international capital.”

Nicola Willis announced the intention to strengthen competition in the supermarket sector at the release of a progress report on the work being done to shift New Zealand to a higher growth track. 

“The Going For Growth snapshot details more than 80 actions that have either been completed since the Government took office or are underway.

“Economic growth is key to raising living standards, creating higher-paying jobs,and delivering the vital public services New Zealanders want and deserve.

“New Zealanders have been through a tough time with high inflation pushing up interest rates and driving the economy into recession.

“lnflation is now back under control but to deliver the opportunities and high-quality public services people expect we need to build a stronger, wealthier and more resilient economy that benefits all New Zealanders.

“Going For Growth details how the Government is going about that task. 

“It sets out the five pillars driving our push for economic growth: Developing talent, Competitive business settings, Promoting global trade and investment, Innovation, technology and science and infrastructure for growth.

“Under each pillar are actions already underway to support growth, with more to come.

“To grasp the opportunities in front of us, we must lean in and boldly pursue the things that will make this country the wealthier country we want it to be. 

“We must adopt a ‘yes’ mentality when sometimes it is easier to say ‘no’.”

Notes to editors: Going For Growth can be found here www.goingforgrowth.govt.nz

MIL OSI

Speech to New Zealand Economics Forum

0

Source: New Zealand Government

Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone.
Thank you Matt for the introduction and can I acknowledge the presence of former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison. It’s a pleasure to have you back in the country.
It’s also a pleasure to be here to speak at this event for the third year in a row. 
The world is changing. Fast. Orthodoxies are being challenged. De-globalisation, tariffs, counter tariffs, artificial intelligence, conflict, cynicism about national institutions, extreme climatic events, increasing competition for food, energy, minerals and other resources.  
Leaders around the world are being compelled to act more boldly than they have for several decades.
Where once countries could take for granted their position in the world, it is now unquestionable that we need to place ourselves in the driver’s seat for our national interests.
These issues are not just the concern of diplomats, leaders and elites.  
People the world over are increasingly feeling the effects of declining living standards, soaring prices, unaffordable housing and incomes that are not  keeping up. 
Is it any wonder that there is a growing sense that the benefits of progress are not being evenly shared or that citizens are questioning the institutions and conventions they were raised to rely on?  
It’s hard not to look back on the past few decades and see complacency. 
Where once there was an assumption about the inevitability of economic growth – a given to be traded off against a host of other values – that stance now seems blissfully naïve.  
From the United Kingdom, to the European Union, to China, to the United States, there is a growing realisation that growth must be fought for and that, even once achieved, can easily slide away.
We in New Zealand are not immune to these trends. In fact, we are at a moment of inflection.  
After three years of struggle, many Kiwis feel poorer, less financially secure and less hopeful about their futures. The cost of living is a daily concern.
New Zealanders have been through the wringer. Where once there was triumphalism about our response to, and recovery, from the COVID-19 pandemic, there is now a realisation that we are still paying the economic price for the disruption it wreaked.  
The aftershocks of extended lock-downs included a generational spike in inflation and the cost of living, extraordinary interest rate hikes, ongoing disruption to migration flows, massive increases in Government debt and a structural deficit in the government books.  
These blows landed on an economy that had being showing cracks for decades. 
New Zealand already faced longstanding issues of low productivity growth, low capital intensity in our firms, low levels of competition in many sectors, challenges in attracting and retaining skills and talent, low uptake of innovation, declining housing affordability and a growing tail of New Zealanders leaving school without basic skills. Today, as Kiwis suffer the real-life effects of economic problems, it’s become even more urgent that we address these complex challenges. 
For the economists in this room these observations about our economic problems can be understood as data points.
For many Kiwis, it is more personal, more visceral and far harder to stomach. The cost of living is too high and they need to see a path out.
Despite falling inflation and interest rates and rising business and consumer confidence, many New Zealanders tell me they still can’t get on top of their bills – even though they’re working harder than ever, that they are worried about whether they’ve saved enough for their retirement, and are concerned about their kids’ prospects should they stay in New Zealand.
My message to those New Zealanders is this: it’s tough right now, but our country has far better years ahead of it.  
It’s easy to lose sight of the reasons to be optimistic, but let’s be confident about how great New Zealand’s potential is.
In a world facing multiple challenges, we have some extraordinary advantages. We’re a safe, secure country with established trading relationships and a reputation as a good place to do business. We are blessed with abundant natural resources – everything from ocean to freshwater, fertile land to minerals and temperate weather. 
In a world worried about food security, we have the world’s best farmers, feeding more than 40 million people with levels of efficiency and sustainability that are the envy of the world. We have a long history of stable democracy, strong institutions and rule of law. We’ve produced world-leading scientific breakthroughs from splitting the atom to the Hamilton Jet Boat. Our entrepreneurs and innovators have converted their ideas into world-beating successes – from  Oscar-winning digital effects to rockets in space.
New Zealand has what it takes to succeed, but for too long we’ve put up stop signs and road cones when we should have been putting our pedal to the metal. 
Our Government’s mission is to make the most of New Zealand’s potential so we can grow the economy and ease the cost of living for New Zealanders. 
Our plan is simple: remove the barriers that have held back growth and create the conditions that will allow businesses to create better paying jobs, more financial security for our families, and more income to pay for world-class education and health services.
Today I am releasing a document that shows how our Government is putting that plan into action. “Going for Growth” is a snapshot of the Government’s activity in five key areas, all designed to ease the cost of living and grow our economy.
The document identifies more than 80 separate initiatives that have been completed or are underway.  Don’t worry, I’m not about to list them all. 
But I do encourage you to give it a read.  Going for Growth will be updated on a regular basis and we are actively seeking your feedback on its content and any actions you think should be added or prioritized. 
The document focusses on five areas which are essential to improving the performance of the New Zealand economy.

Developing talent by lifting education and skills:  Too many of our kids have been leaving school without the basics they need to succeed in an increasingly demanding world. This is a moral failure.  It’s also a fiscal and economic timebomb. Our Government is improving our education system to deliver a better deal for Kiwi kids.
Competitive business settings: Excessive and badly-designed regulations have slowed New Zealand down, added costs and prevented too many good ideas from become reality. Several of our major sectors lack competition and consumers are paying the price. Our Government is removing red tape, reducing compliance costs and promoting competition to deliver a better deal for Kiwi consumers.
Promoting global trade and investment: New Zealand is a small country, geographically distant from many of the world’s large economies. We need to keep pursuing trade relationships and international connections not only to get good prices for our exports, but also to keep up with emerging technologies and to access the world’s talent and capital. Our Government is growing our trade relationships and rolling out the welcome mat for international investment so we can deliver better paying jobs for Kiwis.
Innovation, technology and science:  New Zealand’s science system is not geared up for the future economy. Our businesses have often been slow to invest in the technology needed to make them more productive. We’re modernizing our science and innovation system so we can deliver a better deal for Kiwi businesses who want to use science and tech to grow.
Infrastructure for growth:  New Zealand’s Resource Management system has been weaponised against development, adding cost, slowing things down and stopping too many projects. Despite abundant land, housing remains unaffordable for too many. Major infrastructure projects are too slow, too expensive and too few. Our Government is removing roadblocks to delivery of housing and infrastructure and fast-tracking major developments so we can deliver better living standards for New Zealanders.

Some of you will be familiar with the work we already have underway in each of these areas. Today I want to share some thoughts about a few areas where I think more reform is needed.
Number One. Driving greater competition in sectors that are vital to our national interests, including banking, grocery and electricity.  
The economic impetus for this is clear. Strong competition protects consumer interests, it puts downward pressure on costs, it incentivises innovation and investment, it supports efficient allocation of resources and it drives productivity.
When I look around the business landscape today I see too many sectors where market power has been entrenched to the detriment of everyday people.
New Zealand has seen significant mergers and consolidation across major industries. Big fish have been swallowing the little fish and regulatory barriers have stopped new fish from entering the pond. 
While many super-sized businesses have flourished, in too many cases the Kiwis they sell to have experienced higher prices, fewer choices and a worse deal all round.
In my view, law-makers and regulators have been far too complacent about diminishing levels of competition in vital areas. Large-scale mergers have been repeatedly allowed in major industries, with so-called efficiency prioritised over the interests of consumers.
Well-intended regulations have become a moat, stopping challengers from disrupting the status quo. 
The result?  A raw deal for Kiwi consumers. 
The dominance of big fish has also made it difficult for many small businesses to grow into larger businesses. 
We see it in the banking industry which the Commerce Commission has described as a highly profitable, two-tier oligopoly. The Government is taking action to address this.
And we see it in the supermarket sector in which three large entities, two of whom don’t compete in the same island, effectively control 82 per cent of the market. 
The result, as the Commerce Commission reported in 2022, is that competition between grocery retailers is muted, profits are high, product ranges are limited and shoppers pay higher prices than people in many other countries. 
In this environment it is almost impossible for a new entrant to establish a foothold in the New Zealand market.
Even if they are able to battle their way through the thicket of resource management and overseas investment regulation, they are confronted in many cases by an absence of suitable land for new supermarket developments. It has been land-banked by the established players.
Some of our best food producers also tell me they are struggling because of the duopolistic practices of the major players. 
If Kiwi food producers can’t afford to keep their products on New Zealand supermarket shelves, how are they ever going to grow to the point where they can export overseas?
The supermarket lobby will find 1000 different ways to say this is not the case, but it is. 
The OECD has this to say about the New Zealand supermarket sector:
“Two major players dominate the market through their portfolio of different brands.  As a result, they can extract higher prices from consumers (oligopoly power) but also exert ‘oligopsony power’ on their suppliers, passing on costs and uncertainty to them, with the threat of removing products from shelves if suppliers disagree”
Studies have shown that New Zealand supermarkets were the most expensive for kitchen staples compared with the UK, Ireland and Australia.
If you doubt the findings of the OECD, research papers, or the Commerce Commission, just ask the everyday Mums and Dads at the checkout:
Kiwi shoppers feel ripped-off.  
I think of PK, the Kiwi man who went viral on Tik Tok, sharing how he cried when he discovered how much cheaper the food was when he moved to Australia. I think of the parents in the supermarket aisle, putting back the chocolate biscuits as the weekly shop blows their budget – again.  And I think of all those people who endure gut-wrenching anxiety as they watch their items being scanned and the numbers tallying up on the till.
The weekly supermarket shop makes up a significant proportion of most people’s weekly budget and contributes massively to their cost of living.
They deserve to know they are getting a fair deal.
Right now, I don’t think they are.  I’m ready to pull out all the stops to get them a fairer deal.
The supermarkets will fight back I’m sure. It’s a fight worth having.
So what can the Government do?
Let me reassure you, we are not going to open our own grocery chain. There will be no KiwiShop. 
Instead I’d like to see another competitor enter the supermarket scene to  disrupt the major players, drive down prices and increase options for Kiwi shoppers.
Over the past 12 months, international supermarket chains and local investors have expressed interest in entering the New Zealand grocery market. 
I want to help them succeed.
We owe it to Kiwi shoppers to help remove the barriers that could get in the way of a new entrant.
That could include removing unnecessary regulatory hurdles in the Overseas Investment Act, Resource Management Act and the entire regulatory maze; helping them to access suitable land and properties for development; helping them to attract capital; cracking down on predatory pricing and ensuring they have fair access to products. 
If a new grocery chain opened up here it would deliver massive gains for Kiwi shoppers.  So I’m up for actions needed to help make it happen.
At the same time, the Government must continue our efforts to hold the existing supermarket chains accountable to their customers and suppliers. 
That means enhancing consumer protections and correcting power imbalances between suppliers and supermarkets. It means strengthening the Grocery Supply Code, enforcing action against non-compliance and illegal conduct, introducing a Wholesale Code to enhance access for smaller retailers, introducing disclosure standards for consumer complaints and responding to further recommendations the Commerce Commission makes.
Commerce Minister Andrew Bayly has already been pushing hard in this space. This year we’re dialling up the pressure.
The major supermarket chains should listen up: our Government is on the side of Kiwi shoppers and we will act to defend their interests.
Number two:  The Government’s approach to procurement.
The Government is a huge player in the New Zealand economy. Every year it procures billions of dollars worth of goods and services.
Those doing the procuring understandably play close attention to prices.  That is as it should be. We want value for money. 
But getting value is not just about cost. Getting value is also about assessing the contribution particular contracts can make to New Zealand as a whole.
The Government wants the Government agencies doing the procuring to assess the value as well as the cost of contracts. 
Small and medium-sized businesses say that too often they can’t effectively bid for Government contracts because of the complexity of official procurement processes. 
I am reviewing the Government procurement rules that cause this and will soon be recommending changes to Cabinet. I want to ensure value to New Zealand is properly considered when government agencies are picking suppliers, ensuring a more level playing field, improving the ability of smaller businesses to bid and giving more small and medium sized Kiwi businesses the opportunity to grow and become global players.
Third, tax settings.
New Zealand must ensure our tax settings are competitive with other countries who seek to lure our talent, ideas and jobs.
We need to ensure the New Zealand tax system does not discourage businesspeople from investing in their businesses and does not deter foreign investment. 
I am considering a range of proposals to make our tax settings more competitive over time.
Fourth, affordable energy.
Alongside the supermarket bill, electricity prices are a major pain point for Kiwi households.  Spiking prices and uncertain supply are also a major barrier to industry and the jobs it supports.
As we look out to the world, it’s clear that those choosing to invest in manufacturing, data centers and technological parks will increasingly ask themselves: does the country that we want to invest in have secure, affordable and renewable energy? 
New Zealand is pretty well-positioned for that. We already have abundant levels of renewable energy. 
The question is, are we well positioned to bring on new generation at the pace needed to keep both security of supply and affordability? 
That’s a question the Government is very much engaged in. 
The Energy Competition Task Force has published proposals to give consumers more control over energy costs. In addition, independent reviewers will report to Ministers in the middle of the year on the performance of the energy market.  
My view is that the world’s surging demand for renewable energy has changed the game. It’s time to think much more boldly about the actions the Government may need to take to incentivise new generation, security of supply and affordable electricity.
Fifth, savings.
Finally, I want to see KiwiSaver working as well as possible for New Zealanders. Commerce Minister Andrew Bayly already has work underway to enable Kiwisaver providers to make greater investments in private assets, to generate good returns for savers and ensure more Kiwi savings can be deployed for investment here at home.  
I want to see KiwiSaver balances grow, both to make Kiwis better off in retirement and to grow our collective national savings. I am taking advice on options for achieving that with a view to taking recommendations to Cabinet.
Let me finish by providing you with some perspective. 
Our domestic context is challenging. Internationally we are arguably operating in a more complex, faster changing world than at any time in history. 
But, when I look around the world, there is nowhere I would rather build a business or raise a family than here in New Zealand.
But the world doesn’t owe us a living. We have to compete hard to deliver for our national interests and the interests of New Zealanders. 
Our Government’s plan to grow the economy is about making the most of New Zealand’s many advantages, removing barriers that are holding Kiwis back and competing for our share of the world’s wealth.
This is not an abstract mission.  It goes to the heart of what matters to New Zealanders. 
To create better paying jobs and make Kiwis more financially secure, we must grow our economy.
To deliver better health services and schools, we must grow our economy.
To make New Zealand more resilient to global challenges, we must grow our economy.
This Government backs New Zealanders to succeed. I know you do too. I wish you a successful conference and look forward to hearing your ideas.  Let’s go for growth.

MIL OSI

Whakapapa Holdings Limited public hearings to begin

0

Source: Department of Conservation

Date:  13 February 2025

Acting Deputy Director-General Policy and Regulatory Services Ewan Delany says DOC received 529 submissions.

“We would like to thank everyone who took the time to provide feedback on Whakapapa Holdings concession application to operate the Whakapapa Ski Area on Mt Ruapehu.

“Hearings are the next stage of the process and an opportunity for those who indicated they wanted to talk through their submission in person.

“Information received from the submissions and the hearings will be taken into consideration as part of the assessment of the concession application”, says Ewan.

The hearings will be held in Tūrangi at the DOC office and via Microsoft Teams.  

The Hearing Chair will be Darryn Ratana, DOC Kaihautu, Regional Operations.

More information on the hearings can be found on the DOC website: Application for a concession by Whakapapa Holdings 2024 Limited: Have your say

Contact

For media enquiries contact:

Email: media@doc.govt.nz

MIL OSI

The Risk of Adverse Events Associated with Mesh and Non-Mesh Repair of Groin Hernias: A literature review

0

Source: New Zealand Ministry of Health

Summary

In light of the pause on use of mesh in urogynaecology procedures in New Zealand in 2023, and the hernia mesh report in Australia (Health Issues Centre 2019), the Ministry of Health began a review of the literature on the use of mesh in inguinal (also known as groin) hernia repair. 

This showed that use of mesh in groin hernia repair was associated with reduced rates of hernia recurrence, neurovascular injury and urinary retention (with no gender difference) and reduced or similar rates of post-operative pain, operative time, hospital stay length and time to return to usual activities compared to non-mesh groin hernia repair. Non-mesh repair was associated with a lower risk of seroma formation (fluid collection). Ongoing pain affecting activities of daily living was self-reported in a proportion of patients in whom mesh was used in groin hernia repair.

MIL OSI

First test train journeys through City Rail Link

0

Source: New Zealand Government

A test train has now completed its first trip through the full length of the City Rail Link (CRL) tunnel in Auckland, representing a critical step forward in this game-changing public transport project for our largest city, Transport Minister Chris Bishop and Minister for Auckland Simeon Brown say.

“Started under the previous National Government, CRL will double Auckland’s rail capacity and reduce congestion when it opens in 2026, enabling Aucklanders to get to where they want to go quickly and safely meaning a more productive Auckland. There is still a lot more work to do, but it’s great to see measurable progress being made on site as we countdown to the CRL opening next year,” Mr Bishop says.

“The CRL tunnel’s overhead lines were energised last week, enabling power to be provided to trains in the tunnel. The first test train ran a 3.45km-long journey last night, from Britomart Station to Mt Eden on the new underground section of railway, the first train to travel on a brand-new rail line since 2012. 

“This important test train allowed technical experts to complete their first round of testing relating to tunnel clearance, power supply and signalling. Further testing will ramp up in coming weeks, including brake testing, recovery procedures, tunnel ventilation systems, supervision and security systems, lighting, communications, and the start of hands-on training for Auckland’s metro drivers and station staff, among many others.”

“CRL will be a gamechanger for Auckland’s public transport network, turning Britomart from a dead-end station into a through station, enhancing connections between the central city and the wider rail network,” Simeon Brown says.

“The first train through CRL is an important milestone for the project. Once complete, CRL will result in significant time savings, and make public transport a much more viable option for Aucklanders.” 

“This is momentous for the City Rail Link programme and Auckland ratepayers who have made a significant contribution, alongside government, to get this project completed,” says Mayor Wayne Brown.

“Our city deserves a public transport system that will deliver for Aucklanders and visitors alike. I’ve always said I was determined to get the project finished and over the line, and while the project has had its fair share of challenges and there are lessons we’ll take from it, I’m pleased to see that progress has been made and that we can finally see the light at the end of the tunnel.” 

“I want to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of everyone involved in the CRL project to get us to this point. There is a lot more work to do, but today represents an important milestone in moving from a construction site into a railway,” Mr Bishop says.

“Tens of thousands of Auckland commuters are right behind you, and they’re looking forward to experiencing the benefits your hard work will deliver when CRL opens next year.”

Note to editors:

Once operational, City Rail Link (CRL) benefits for Auckland passengers at peak times include: 

  • On the Southern Line – trains every 5 minutes (compared to 10 minutes currently) north of Puhinui, every 8 minutes between Papakura and Homai, and every 10 minutes between Pukekohe and Drury 
  • On the Eastern Line – trains every 5 minutes between Sylvia Park and Ōrākei   
  • On the Western Line – trains every 8 minutes between Swanson and Maungawhau 

Subject to Auckland Transport confirming train timetables, the combination of using the CRL tunnel and reduced temporary speed restrictions are expected to see:  

  • Maungawhau (Mt Eden) to Waitematā (Britomart): under 10 minutes (half the current time)
  • Kingsland to Waitematā (Britomart): 13 minutes (8 minutes faster than currently)  

Henderson to Waitematā (Britomart): 38 minutes (8 minutes faster than currently)

MIL OSI