Source: New Zealand Police (National News)
Please attribute to Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura:
Police acknowledges the release of a comprehensive report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) which looks at the policing of public protests in New Zealand and makes several significant recommendations.
Police has worked closely with the IPCA on this review, which has arisen from complaints to the independent body following high profile protests over recent years.
We have seen a significant change in the protest environment, aided by social media, in which these events are becoming more publicised, highly organised and, in some instances, utilising complex tactics.
We are now often faced with these events involving protesters, counter protesters, and activists who are present for a variety of different causes.
These changes are a global trend which is putting more pressure on police jurisdictions around the world.
In the last two years, New Zealand Police has attended and monitored at least 140 protests across the country.
Police is always focussed on ensuring the community has the right to protest but balancing this against upholding the law and ensuring the safety of those attending, as well as members of the public in the vicinity.
The 2022 parliamentary protest, as well as recent rallies regarding the conflict between Israel and Palestine, highlight some of the complex issues Police is dealing with.
Today’s report recommends several changes and Police accepts and agrees with these in principle.
The most significant is the recommendation for a new stand-alone legislation which would put New Zealand in line with comparative jurisdictions such as Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada.
Any legislative reform would be led by the Minister of Justice.
There are also recommendations regarding police policies, processes, and training in the public order policing area.
Police is considering how best to respond to these, noting that our organisation has already undertaken a raft of changes following the parliamentary protests.
Our progress and work in this area has been acknowledged by the IPCA in the report.
We know our officers who work in Public Order Policing teams, as well as all officers who attend to support and police these events, do an incredible job at keeping people safe in what can be a challenging and highly emotional environment.
We know we must continually improve and adapt to the changing environment in protests and so we look forward to seeing where this review leads us.
There were three separate investigations into protests in Auckland which are outlined in this review, and we have responded to each of these as below.
Investigation one:
The IPCA investigated a high number of complaints regarding the Police response to the Let Women Speak rally held at Albert Park in March 2023.
This event became volatile very quickly due to behaviour by counter protesters who surrounded the rotunda when the main speaker arrived.
Police acknowledge the finding by the IPCA in relation to the protest, which says our initial risk assessment could have been better.
We also accept that our response on the day when protestors surrounded the rotunda was inadequate.
We do note that our staff were also dealing with a separate unrelated protest on the same day, not far from this location, alongside other operational demands which put significant pressure on officers at these time sensitive events.
The criticism of the policing of this event was not due to the fault of any individual officer but rather learnings around undertaking a better risk assessment for any future protests, ensuring we have adequate resourcing for these unpredictable events.
We have debriefed this matter and taken these lessons onboard.
We also note that Police carried out an investigation following the event, and two counter-protesters were charged with assault.
Investigation two:
The second investigation referenced in the IPCA report relates to the arrest of a counter-protestor during a rally in support of Palestine in November 2023 at Aotea Square, Auckland.
A man was holding an Israeli flag around 150 metres from where protesters were setting up a speaking area.
Police told the man to leave and stay away from the event to prevent a potential breach of the peace. They told the man he would be arrested if he returned.
The man left but returned without his flag, his face covered, and stood in Aotea Square while speeches took place.
He was arrested and charged with intentionally obstructing a police officer acting in the execution of his duty.
Police accept this arrest was unlawful and while the intent of the officers was to ensure the man’s safety, we accept they had no lawful basis to tell him to leave or to arrest him when he returned.
We have spoken with the officers involved in this incident and have used this as a learning opportunity for them.
The charge of obstruction was withdrawn.
Investigation three:
During the same rally in Auckland’s CBD in November 2023, Police came across a different counter-protester who was holding a sign which they believed had the potential to incite violence.
Police, concerned for the woman’s safety, asked her to move and put down her sign and when she failed to comply, they had to move her a short distance away and took her sign off her.
When she continued to try and re-enter the protest they arrested her for a breach of the peace.
The IPCA has found the use of force to move the woman away was unjustified and the arrest was unlawful.
While Police acknowledge the IPCA’s view on this, we believe our officers were acting in the woman’s best interests to keep her safe due to their previous experience at pro-Palestine events which had turned violent very quickly.
We do accept that she should have been given her sign back when she was released by Police.
The primary role of Police at these events is to ensure everyone’s safety while they protest.
If there is a concern that someone may be harmed, Police will act within the boundaries of the law to protect all individuals present.
We recognise the delicate balance between a person’s right to peacefully protest and maintaining public order.
Our officers are entrusted to make these decisions based on their knowledge and information available to them.
ENDS
Issued by the Police Media Centre