Culture and Heritage – Creative and cultural strategy receives hundreds of submissions
Source: Ministry for Culture and Heritage
Northland News – Changes to tsunami evacuation maps for Northland
Source: Northland Regional Council
Business – Canterbury Businesses Show Resilience Amid Rising Global Concerns
Source: Business Canterbury
Awards – Grasslanz Technology claims top science honour
A plant technology company that has been a major contributor to the success of New Zealand agriculture for more than two decades has been recognised with the supreme honour at the 2025 Science New Zealand Awards.
AgResearch subsidiary, Grasslanz Technology Limited, was announced today as the supreme award winner in recognition of its record of introducing valuable new types of pasture and related technologies that have helped livestock industries to thrive.
Among these is the commercialisation of the AR37 Epichloë endophyte developed by AgResearch scientists, which provides resistance to pests and has been independently estimated as contributing $3.6 billion to the New Zealand economy over the life of its 20-year patent.
“This award is a real credit to the many people who have been a part of the enduring success of Grasslanz Technology,” says Grasslanz Technology chief executive Megan Skiffington.
“That means everyone from the science teams who made the discoveries and did the research, through to those who partnered with us because they believed in turning this research into products that farmers and growers can use to enhance the productivity and sustainability of agriculture in this country.”
The Chairs of the Judging Panels for the Science New Zealand Awards, who selected the Supreme Award winner, said Grasslanz Technology stood out “because of its contribution to the growth of the New Zealand economy through excellent science directed to solve issues faced by the primary sector in an economically and environmentally sustainable fashion”.
The Science New Zealand Awards celebrate the best of the science and its impacts across New Zealand’s Crown Research Institutes and Callaghan Innovation.
The Government announced earlier this year that the seven Crown Research Institutes will soon be merged into new Public Research Organisations, including one that includes AgResearch and is focused on the bioeconomy.
Skiffington says this new structure presents exciting possibilities for Grasslanz to grow its reach and seize other opportunities to bolster the primary sector. This includes opportunities using technologies such as genetic modification and gene editing in pasture and beyond.
“We know that farmers and growers do better when backed by great science. With our partners, Grasslanz has delivered that impact on the ground. We think we will be able to bring even more value to the new Public Research Organisation with our proven business model, helping a larger pool of scientists to provide solutions to those farmers and growers.”
More about the Science New Zealand Awards can be found at: https://sciencenewzealand.org/; and more about Grasslanz Technology at: www.grasslanz.com
Another firearm off the street following Tikipunga search
Source: New Zealand Police (District News)
Police have taken a firearm capable of firing .22 rounds off the streets after locating thew weapon down the side of a couch.
At about 1pm on Wednesday, officers executed a search warrant at a Tikipunga address on Papa Totara Loop.
Detective Senior Sergeant Aaron Crawford, Northland CIB, says Police quickly arrested a man in relation to failing to stop, displaying insignia, possession of firearm and ammunition.
“During a search officers have located an operational magazine with live .22 rounds allegedly in the man’s pocket, as well as loose rounds.
“A further search of the address has then also located a pistol capable of firing .22 rounds, which was found down the side of the couch where the man was sitting upon Police arrival.”
Detective Senior Sergeant Crawford says the arrest was a great outcome by the team.
“As a result we have taken another firearm out of circulation from our community.
“Police work hard to hold offenders to account, especially those with the potential to cause serious harm in our communities, such as those unlawfully in the possession of firearms.”
A 34-year-old man will appear in Whangārei District Court today charged with two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm and failing to carry out obligations in relation to a computer search.
ENDS.
Holly McKay/NZ Police
Universities – How New Zealand Universities Rank in the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025
New Zealand sees decline in rankings as employer reputation indicator scores in other countries soar, but some stand-out performances in sport-related subjects.
London, March 12th: International higher education experts QS Quacquarelli Symonds have today released the 15th annual edition of, and its largest ever, the QS World University Rankings by Subject.
The rankings provide an independent comparative analysis of the performance of more than 18,300 individual academic offerings, taken by students at more than 1,700 universities found in 100 locations across the world, across 55 academic disciplines and five broad faculty areas.1 They are part of the annual QS World University Rankings portfolio, which was consulted 80 million times in 2024, and covered 134,000 times by media and institutions worldwide.
- 113 entries from New Zealand feature in the top 200, 21 more than last year.
- Massey University’s Veterinary Science entry breaks into the global top 20, meaning two entries from New Zealand in top 20
- The University of Auckland most successful New Zealand institution this year, with 14 of its 51 entries improving
- However, 110 of the 216 entries from New Zealand have dropped in this iteration
- Universities need to do more to meet employer expectations with 75% of entries see drops in employer reputation indicator scores
- Universities continue to excel in Sports-related subjects – 14 entries improving their ranking in their respective subjects
Focus New Zealand
In two key broad subject areas – Social Sciences & Management and Arts & Humanities – all but one institution fell. The University of Auckland increased its ranking in Social Sciences & Management by six to reach 63rd and in Arts & Humanities it rose by nine to be ranked joint 61.
In Natural Sciences, The University of Auckland rose by 25 places to be ranked joint 146 and the University of Otago increased its position by three to be ranked joint 374th worldwide. The other three institutions fell in this broad subject area. The University of Auckland also increased its ranking in the Engineering & Technology broad subject area by 22 and is ranked joint 105. The other two institutions from the country included in the ranking for this area fell.
All three New Zealand universities in the Life Sciences & Medicine broad subject range fell.
In future-critical fields such as AI, digital, and green technologies—spotlighted in the recently launched QS World Future Skills Index—New Zealand’s universities have room to expand their influence. While the Computer Science & Information Systems at seven universities feature in the ranking, of the 103 ranked Data Science & Artificial Intelligence entries, none are from New Zealand.
Table 1. New Zealand compared |
||||||||
Country |
Total entries |
Up |
Same ranking |
Down |
New |
|||
New Zealand |
216 |
26 |
12% |
71 |
33% |
110 |
51% |
9 |
Hong Kong |
257 |
181 |
70% |
35 |
14% |
16 |
6% |
25 |
China |
1389 |
838 |
60% |
132 |
10% |
53 |
4% |
366 |
Korea |
617 |
330 |
53% |
69 |
11% |
80 |
13% |
138 |
USA |
3686 |
914 |
25% |
1132 |
31% |
1320 |
36% |
320 |
Australia |
944 |
215 |
23% |
316 |
33% |
354 |
38% |
59 |
UK |
1883 |
384 |
20% |
657 |
35% |
701 |
37% |
141 |
The University of Auckland ranks highest in each of the five broad faculty areas.
Table 2. Five highest ranked broad faculty areas in New Zealand |
||||
Broad Faculty Area |
University |
2025 Rank |
2024 comparison |
Number of NZ unis in 2025 |
Arts & Humanities |
The University of Auckland |
61 |
+9 |
7 |
Engineering & Technology |
The University of Auckland |
107 |
+22 |
3 |
Life Sciences & Medicine |
The University of Auckland |
15 |
-4 |
3 |
Natural Sciences |
The University of Auckland |
146 |
+25 |
5 |
Social Sciences & Management |
The University of Auckland |
63 |
+6 |
7 |
Ben Sowter, Senior Vice President at QS, said: “New Zealand has historically batted well above its weight in the international higher education landscape. However, like other popular study destinations, it is being challenged by new players on the global education market, which is evident in this year QS World University Ranking by Subject. Institutions will need to continue improving their outcomes for students and ensuring they are producing graduates and talent that industry is calling out for. While the University of Auckland continues to be the most represented institution in the ranking from New Zealand, Massey University and The University of Otago have some star performances in certain subjects. The country is continuing to look internationally for talent and skills, as outlined in the recent Going for Growth plan, international students are one key source of expertise, knowledge and connections. The academic quality of New Zealand’s research sector continues to be highly regarded internationally.”
Table 3. New Zealand Rankings entries by indicator |
||||||||
Up |
Neutral |
Down |
New |
|||||
Academic reputation |
101 |
47% |
2 |
1% |
104 |
48% |
9 |
4% |
Employer reputation |
38 |
18% |
6 |
3% |
163 |
75% |
9 |
4% |
Citations per paper |
106 |
49% |
1 |
0% |
92 |
43% |
17 |
8% |
H-Index |
89 |
41% |
2 |
1% |
97 |
45% |
28 |
13% |
International research network (by broad faculty area) |
35 |
16% |
0 |
0% |
59 |
27% |
122 |
56% |
Employer Reputation is an area where New Zealand universities lag behind global competitors. The reputation of New Zealand graduates among employers has declined for 163 of the entries featured in this edition of the QS World University Rankings by Subject. However, results from the International Research Network (IRN) Index—measuring the extent to which institutions diversify their global research partnerships—suggest that New Zealand universities are making a concerted effort to strengthen their international collaborations. In contrast, Academic Reputation has improved for 47% of entries from the country featured in this year’s rankings. Additionally, Research Citations per Paper data from Elsevier Scopus indicates that rankings have improved for 49% of entries. Similarly, H-Index scores, which measure both the productivity and impact of academics based on citation performance, highlight strong performance among universities in New Zealand.
Sowter added: “With rapid transformations in the world of work already underway, higher education is under mounting pressure to evolve, ensuring that students, universities, and industries all benefit from the teaching they offer. The significant decline in employer reputation for many New Zealand entries should serve as a wake-up call for higher education providers. They cannot afford to rest on their laurels—they must continue embedding in-demand skills into curricula and fostering stronger industry collaboration to equip graduates to drive real change in the future.”
Table 4. New Zealand’s top ranked entries compared to rest of world (broad faculty and narrow subjects) |
|||||||||||||||||
Country |
Total entries |
Top 1 |
Top 3 |
Top 10 |
Top 20 |
Top 50 |
Top 100 |
Top 200 |
Top 500 |
||||||||
New Zealand |
216 |
2 |
+1 |
10 |
-8 |
52 |
-4 |
113 |
+21 |
204 |
+3 |
||||||
United States |
3686 |
37 |
No change |
89 |
+1 |
270 |
No change |
498 |
+51 |
920 |
+81 |
1468 |
+151 |
2301 |
+280 |
3408 |
+515 |
UK |
1883 |
18 |
+2 |
62 |
-5 |
155 |
-8 |
242 |
+7 |
441 |
+15 |
775 |
+73 |
1262 |
+139 |
1770 |
+225 |
Switzerland |
266 |
4 |
No change |
7 |
+1 |
32 |
-3 |
46 |
+6 |
64 |
-1 |
105 |
-2 |
196 |
+23 |
258 |
+45 |
Netherlands |
398 |
2 |
No change |
5 |
-2 |
14 |
-1 |
31 |
-2 |
85 |
-11 |
192 |
+24 |
305 |
+45 |
394 |
+71 |
Italy |
730 |
1 |
No change |
1 |
No change |
7 |
-1 |
17 |
-1 |
45 |
-8 |
154 |
+8 |
336 |
+29 |
651 |
+117 |
Singapore |
114 |
5 |
+4 |
34 |
+6 |
57 |
+6 |
84 |
+7 |
96 |
+5 |
107 |
+8 |
112 |
+10 |
||
China |
1389 |
4 |
+4 |
21 |
+13 |
81 |
+48 |
231 |
+103 |
436 |
+180 |
698 |
+228 |
1255 |
+443 |
||
Australia |
994 |
3 |
-1 |
13 |
-4 |
31 |
-20 |
204 |
+1 |
403 |
+28 |
611 |
+50 |
909 |
+131 |
||
Canada |
764 |
2 |
+1 |
16 |
-2 |
51 |
-7 |
161 |
+10 |
246 |
+19 |
434 |
+37 |
707 |
+85 |
||
Hong Kong |
257 |
2 |
+1 |
6 |
+2 |
31 |
+16 |
108 |
+38 |
173 |
+44 |
216 |
+41 |
254 |
+54 |
||
France |
655 |
1 |
-4 |
6 |
+1 |
19 |
-5 |
78 |
+4 |
169 |
+24 |
327 |
+40 |
597 |
+114 |
||
Sweden |
254 |
1 |
No change |
5 |
+1 |
6 |
-4 |
26 |
-4 |
82 |
-7 |
167 |
-6 |
243 |
-5 |
||
Japan |
558 |
3 |
-1 |
18 |
+2 |
74 |
+8 |
159 |
+23 |
288 |
+35 |
494 |
+96 |
||||
Germany |
929 |
3 |
-2 |
13 |
-3 |
84 |
-13 |
236 |
+11 |
480 |
+38 |
854 |
+122 |
||||
Korea |
617 |
2 |
+2 |
10 |
+7 |
102 |
+59 |
213 |
+96 |
329 |
+123 |
545 |
+166 |
||||
Denmark |
180 |
2 |
+2 |
7 |
-1 |
30 |
-3 |
73 |
No change |
124 |
+6 |
175 |
+2 |
||||
Saudi Arabia |
217 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
No change |
5 |
+1 |
13 |
-1 |
43 |
+7 |
97 |
+10 |
182 |
+52 |
||
Finland |
148 |
2 |
+1 |
3 |
No change |
11 |
-1 |
32 |
No change |
61 |
-5 |
125 |
-12 |
Best performing institutions in New Zealand:
- The University of Auckland is once again the most represented institution from New Zealand in the World University Rankings by Subject, with 51 entries. It is also top in the country in each of the five broad faculty areas.
- University of Otago is home to the highest ranked entry in the country, with its Sports-related subject ranking placing it at 11th worldwide, up one place since last year.
- Massey University’s Veterinary Science entry has broken into the global top 20, improving its positioning by two spots, to be ranked 19th overall.
Table 5. Results by institution |
||||||||
Institution |
2025 entries count |
2025 best rank |
Entry |
2024 best rank |
Ups |
Downs |
Unchanged |
New |
The University of Auckland
|
51 |
24 |
Sports-related Subjects |
21 |
14 |
17 |
19 |
1 |
University of Otago |
40 |
11 |
Sports-related Subjects |
12 |
2 |
23 |
13 |
2 |
Victoria University of Wellington |
39 |
51 |
Development Studies |
48 |
1 |
23 |
12 |
3 |
University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha |
30 |
51 |
Geography |
51 |
2 |
19 |
8 |
1 |
Massey University |
25 |
19 |
Veterinary Science |
21 |
3 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
University of Waikato |
15 |
101 |
Sports-related Subjects |
51 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
1 |
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) |
13 |
38 |
Sports-related Subjects |
28 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
0 |
Lincoln University |
3 |
101 |
Hospitality & Leisure Management and Agriculture & Forestry |
51 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Most improved rankings
Among the 21 entries that have improved their positions this year, three are broad faculty areas. The University of Auckland saw its entries in Natural Sciences rise to joint 146 worldwide and its Engineering & Technology ranking rise to joint 107. Massey University in turn saw its Arts & Humanities entry rise by 16 places to joint 322. Of the 18 subject entries improving this year, 12 are entries from the University of Auckland.
Table 6. New Zealand’s subject entries that have improved this year |
||||
Institution |
Subject |
2025 rank |
2024 rank |
Change |
The University of Auckland |
Archaeology |
27 |
39 |
+12 |
The University of Auckland |
Arts & Humanities |
61 |
70 |
+9 |
The University of Auckland |
Mathematics |
98 |
105 |
+7 |
The University of Auckland |
Social Sciences & Management |
63 |
69 |
+6 |
The University of Auckland |
Sociology |
89 |
95 |
+6 |
The University of Auckland |
Sports-related Subjects |
24 |
28 |
+4 |
University of Otago |
Natural Sciences |
374 |
377 |
+3 |
The University of Auckland |
Education |
34 |
37 |
+3 |
The University of Auckland |
Computer Science & Information Systems |
96 |
99 |
+3 |
Massey University |
Veterinary Science |
19 |
21 |
+2 |
The University of Auckland |
Theology, Divinity & Religious Studies |
51-100 |
101-140 |
1 band |
University of Otago |
Sports-related Subjects |
11 |
12 |
+1 |
University of Waikato |
Sociology |
201-250 |
251-300 |
1 band |
The University of Auckland |
Philosophy |
51-100 |
101-150 |
1 band |
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) |
Nursing |
101-150 |
151-200 |
1 band |
Victoria University of Wellington |
Mathematics |
251-300 |
301-350 |
1 band |
University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha |
Law |
151-200 |
201-250 |
1 band |
The University of Auckland |
Engineering – Electrical & Electronic |
118 |
119 |
+1 |
Lincoln University |
Economics & Econometrics |
451-500 |
501-550 |
1 band |
Auckland University of Technology (AUT) |
Computer Science & Information Systems |
401-450 |
451-500 |
1 band |
Massey University |
Computer Science & Information Systems |
551-600 |
601-650 |
1 band |
University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha |
Business & Management Studies |
301-350 |
351-400 |
1 band |
The University of Auckland |
Art & Design |
101-150 |
151-200 |
1 band |
The University of Auckland also dominates in the highest ranked entry per subject or broad faculty areas, with 49 top or joint top positions in the country.
Table 7. Subjects by order of prevalence among New Zealand’s entries |
|||||||
Subject |
2025 count |
2024 count |
2025 Rank |
Top Ranked University |
|||
Economics & Econometrics |
8 |
8 |
112 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Social Sciences & Management |
7 |
7 |
63 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Arts & Humanities |
7 |
7 |
61 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Education |
7 |
7 |
34 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Computer Science & Information Systems |
7 |
7 |
96 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Business & Management Studies |
7 |
7 |
117 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Accounting & Finance |
7 |
7 |
66 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Sociology |
6 |
6 |
89 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Psychology |
6 |
6 |
51 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Geography |
6 |
6 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha |
||
Natural Sciences |
5 |
5 |
146 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Physics & Astronomy |
5 |
5 |
201-250 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Medicine |
5 |
5 |
119 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Law |
5 |
5 |
59 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Hospitality & Leisure Management |
5 |
5 |
51-100 |
AUT |
University of Otago |
The University of Auckland |
|
Environmental Sciences |
5 |
7 |
149 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
English Language & Literature |
5 |
5 |
54 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Chemistry |
5 |
5 |
159 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Biological Sciences |
5 |
5 |
161 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Agriculture & Forestry |
5 |
5 |
67 |
Massey University |
|||
Geophysics |
4 |
4 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Geology |
4 |
4 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Sports-related Subjects |
4 |
4 |
11 |
University of Otago |
|||
Politics & International Studies |
4 |
4 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
Victoria University of Wellington |
||
Philosophy |
4 |
4 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Nursing |
4 |
4 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Modern Languages |
4 |
4 |
79 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Linguistics |
4 |
5 |
58 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Engineering – Electrical & Electronic |
4 |
4 |
118 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Earth & Marine Sciences |
4 |
4 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Development Studies |
4 |
3 |
51-100 |
Massey University |
The University of Auckland |
Victoria University of Wellington |
|
Communication & Media Studies |
4 |
4 |
101-150 |
Massey University |
The University of Auckland |
||
Classics & Ancient History |
4 |
0 |
51-150 |
The University of Auckland |
University of Canterbury | Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha |
University of Otago |
Victoria University of Wellington |
Archaeology |
4 |
2 |
27 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Life Sciences & Medicine |
3 |
4 |
93 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Engineering & Technology |
3 |
3 |
107 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Theology, Divinity & Religious Studies |
3 |
3 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
University of Otago |
Victoria University of Wellington |
|
History |
3 |
3 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Engineering – Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing |
3 |
3 |
115 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Architecture / Built Environment |
3 |
3 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Anthropology |
3 |
2 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Pharmacy & Pharmacology |
2 |
2 |
77 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Performing Arts |
2 |
2 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Mathematics |
2 |
4 |
98 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Engineering – Civil & Structural |
2 |
2 |
48 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Engineering – Chemical |
2 |
3 |
151-200 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Art & Design |
2 |
3 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Anatomy & Physiology |
2 |
3 |
35 |
University of Otago |
|||
Marketing |
1 |
1 |
46 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Veterinary Science |
1 |
1 |
19 |
Massey University |
|||
Statistics & Operational Research |
1 |
1 |
101-150 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Social Policy & Administration |
1 |
1 |
51-100 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Materials Science |
1 |
1 |
151-200 |
The University of Auckland |
|||
Library & Information Management |
1 |
1 |
51-100 |
Victoria University of Wellington |
|||
Dentistry |
1 |
1 |
44 |
University of Otago |
Global highlights
The 2025 QS World University Ranking by Subject is the largest ever edition, with more than 18,300 individual academic offerings, taken by students at more than 1,700 universities in 100 locations across the world. The results are drawn from five indicators – academic and employer reputation based on a global survey of 175,000+ academics and 100,000+ employers, research citations per paper, H-index, and international research network
Ben Sowter, QS Senior Vice President, said: “Our largest-ever subjects rankings continues to illuminate factors influencing the quality of higher education institutions globally. The countries that have traditionally led international university rankings, despite continuing to dominate the top places, are beginning to be challenged by developing higher education markets. This is evident in the strong performances of countries in Asia and the Middle East this year – a trend that is likely to only continue given the financial hardships universities in the US, UK, Australia and Canada are facing.”
- US universities lead in 32 subjects. Harvard University is the world’s strongest-performing institution, ranking first in 15 disciplines. It is followed by MIT which leads in 11 subjects.
- UK institutions top 18 subject tables, with the University of Cambridge leading in four.
- Canada is home to two top three global entries and the University of British Columbia is joint top in the world for number of subjects featured in the ranking this year with 52 mentions.
- Switzerland is home to four top ranked subjects, with EHT Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology top in three subjects.
- The Netherlands and Italy are the only other two locations home to the world’s best entries. Sapienza University of Rome maintains its number one spot for Classics and Ancient History, while the University of Amsterdam’s Communication & Media Studies and the Agriculture & Forestry entry at Wageningen University & Research are also first in their respective subjects.
- Hong Kong – 55 of The University of Hong Kong’s subject rankings feature in their respective top 200, the highest out of all institutions. It also saw the highest number of ranking increases this year, with 47, while The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) saw 43 rises.
- China is home to universities with the most new entries this year. Sun Yat-sen University and Xiamen University both saw 13 more entries included this year. Peking University saw 43 of its 50 entries rise in the ranking this year, joint second most in the world.
Table 7. Top institution in each narrow subject |
||||
Institution |
Country |
Subject |
2025 |
2024 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Accounting & Finance |
1 |
1 |
Wageningen University & Research |
Netherlands |
Agriculture & Forestry |
1 |
1 |
University of Oxford |
UK |
Anatomy & Physiology |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Anthropology |
1 |
2 |
University of Cambridge |
UK |
Archaeology |
1 |
1 |
The Bartlett School of Architecture | UCL |
UK |
Architecture / Built Environment |
1 |
1 |
Royal College of Art |
UK |
Art & Design |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Biological Sciences |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Business & Management Studies |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Chemistry |
1 |
1 |
Sapienza University of Rome |
Italy |
Classics & Ancient History |
1 |
1 |
University of Amsterdam |
Netherlands |
Communication & Media Studies |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
USA |
Computer Science & Information Systems |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
USA |
Data Science and Artificial Intelligence |
1 |
1 |
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor |
USA |
Dentistry |
1 |
1 |
University of Sussex |
UK |
Development Studies |
1 |
1 |
ETH Zurich |
Switzerland |
Earth & Marine Sciences |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Economics & Econometrics |
1 |
1 |
UCL Institute of Education | University College London |
UK |
Education |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Engineering – Chemical |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Engineering – Civil & Structural |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Engineering – Electrical & Electronic |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Engineering – Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing |
1 |
1 |
Colorado School of Mines |
USA |
Engineering – Mineral & Mining |
1 |
1 |
University of Cambridge |
UK |
English Language & Literature |
1 |
2 |
University of Oxford |
UK |
English Language & Literature |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Environmental Sciences |
1 |
1 |
University of Oxford |
UK |
Geography |
1 |
1 |
ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology |
Switzerland |
Geology |
1 |
1 |
ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology |
Switzerland |
Geophysics |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
History |
1 |
1 |
Royal College of Art |
UK |
History of Art |
1 |
1 |
EHL Hospitality Business School |
Switzerland |
Hospitality & Leisure Management |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Law |
1 |
1 |
The University of Sheffield |
UK |
Library & Information Management |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Linguistics |
1 |
1 |
University of Cambridge |
UK |
Marketing |
1 |
3 |
University of Pennsylvania |
USA |
Marketing |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Materials Science |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Mathematics |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Medicine |
1 |
1 |
University of Cambridge |
UK |
Modern Languages |
1 |
1 |
Royal College of Music |
UK |
Music |
1 |
1 |
King’s College London |
UK |
Nursing |
1 |
2 |
Royal College of Music |
UK |
Performing Arts |
1 |
1 |
University of Texas at Austin |
USA |
Petroleum Engineering |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Pharmacy & Pharmacology |
1 |
1 |
New York University (NYU) |
USA |
Philosophy |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Physics & Astronomy |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Politics & International Studies |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Psychology |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Social Policy & Administration |
1 |
1 |
Harvard University |
USA |
Sociology |
1 |
1 |
Loughborough University |
UK |
Sports-related Subjects |
1 |
1 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) |
USA |
Statistics & Operational Research |
1 |
1 |
University of Notre Dame |
USA |
Theology, Divinity & Religious Studies |
1 |
3 |
Royal Veterinary College, University of London |
UK |
Veterinary Science |
1 |
1 |
Methodology QS use five key metrics to compile the subject rankings. The precise weighting of each metric varies by subject to reflect differing publication cultures across disciplines. For example, research performance, based on the analysis of the bibliometric database Scopus/Elsevier, is deemed to be a stronger indicator of institutional strength in Medicine, where the discipline is highly reliant on dissemination of research, than it is in Performing Arts, where the discipline is more vocational in nature. Detailed methodological information can be found at https://www.TopUniversities.com/subject-rankings/methodology.
The full rankings can be found at https://www.topuniversities.com/subject-rankings
Notes
QS Quacquarelli Symonds
QS Quacquarelli Symonds is the world’s leading provider of services, analytics, and insight to the global higher education sector, whose mission is to empower motivated people anywhere in the world to fulfil their potential through educational achievement, international mobility, and career development.
The QS World University Rankings portfolio, inaugurated in 2004, is the world’s most popular source of comparative data about university performance.
Their flagship website, www.TopUniversities.com – the home of their rankings – was viewed more than 120 million times in 2023, and over 124,000 media clippings pertaining to, or mentioning, QS were published by media outlets across the world in 2023.
About Scopus/Elsevier
Scopus uniquely combines a comprehensive, expertly curated abstract and citation database with enriched data and linked scholarly literature across various disciplines. Scopus quickly finds relevant and authoritative research, identifies experts, and provides access to reliable data, metrics, and analytical tools. Be confident in progressing research, teaching or research direction and priorities — all from one database and with one subscription. https://www.scopus.com/home.uri
Release: Members’ Bill makes wage theft a crime
Source: New Zealand Labour Party
Workers will now be able to go to the Police and report their employer if they are not being paid wages they’re owed.
Parliament has passed the Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill today led by Labour MP Camilla Belich, inserting a new section 220AA into the Crimes Act 1961.
“This Members’ Bill recognises wage theft as a crime, making the intentional withholding of wages, salaries and other monetary entitlements illegal,” Camilla Belich said.
“Until now, it has been a complicated process for a victim of theft by employer to make a claim and has deterred workers from seeking justice for wage theft.
“Theft is theft, and before this Bill was law workers had to take up a civil case. Civil wage claims are difficult for any employee to initiate and often time consuming and expensive. Now workers can go to the Police and report wage theft as a crime.
“We recognise most employers would never intentionally take their employees hard earned wages, but unfortunately a small minority do. This law will combat intentional exploitation against vulnerable workers.
“Wage theft is already illegal in many other jurisdictions, including Australia, California and Norway.
“I acknowledge my former colleague Ibrahim Omer for bringing this bill to the House and the unions for their ongoing support of working people. I am proud this bill has passed tonight with the support of NZ First, the Green Party and Te Pāti Māori,” Camilla Belich said.
Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on Facebook, Instagram, and X.
Missed opportunity to stop the stealing of Māori land
Source: Green Party
The Green Party is disappointed the Government voted down Hūhana Lyndon’s member’s Bill, which would have prevented further alienation of Māori land through the Public Works Act.
“Today represents a missed opportunity to end a legacy of injustice that has seen Māori land stolen across generations,” says Green Party MP Hūhana Lyndon.
“My Bill aimed to address a critical flaw in the Public Works Act, whereby Māori land can be acquired by a Minister or local authority for public works, without the consent of affected Māori communities.
“For generations, te iwi Māori have watched as land has been taken, piece by piece, acre by acre and never returned.
“We have already lost so much, Māori should be empowered to say yes or no when it comes to the possession of their land. It is this choice, this tino rangatiratanga that lies at the core of my Bill, something the Government chose to shoot down.
“Our Prime Minister has the audacity to tell Māori that Te Tiriti is our past, present and future, yet also undermine the very foundation of our founding agreement by allowing the confiscation of Māori land to continue. As a result, this tool of the Crown will continue to be used today, tomorrow, and into our future.
“However, today was just a speed bump on the road to Te Tiriti justice. We know the movement we are building, that we are seeing flood streets across the motu, will not allow this injustice to continue for much longer,” says Hūhana Lyndon.
Our Waitarakao Strategy adoption accelerates action
Source: Environment Canterbury Regional Council
Our Waitarakao: Waitarakao Washdyke Lagoon Catchment Strategy includes measures to increase natural hazard resilience, address poor water quality and improve biodiversity. As well as planning the long-term future for lagoon and surrounding areas, including adjoining creeks and nearby wetlands.
A small gathering of about 40 people took place on Sunday 9 March overlooking the lagoon, to witness the project partners signing the strategy and to celebrate its adoption.
It marked the culmination of 18 months’ work by the community and four partner agencies – Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua, Timaru District Council, the Department of Conservation and us.
Working together for the mauri of Waitarakao
Chair Craig Pauling said the adoption of the strategy signifies a shared commitment to working towards the long-term health and sustainability of Waitarakao.
Front – Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua Upoko Tewera King; Back row (left to right) – Tony Preston Department of Conservation, Craig Pauling Chair of Environment Canterbury, Nigel Bowen Mayor of Timaru District Council.
“Waitarakao is quite a rare coastal environment in this region, with unique ecosystems and important habitat for wildlife. The community and our partners are taking this restoration seriously – it’s a great example of collective action for the environment.”
That collaboration across the community was also highlighted by the other partners.
According to Timaru Mayor Nigel Bowen, “This strategy is an example of what can be achieved when multiple agencies come together and work as one.
“As a coastal town, it is important that we look after our environments, for our future generations. The success of the strategy can be credited to the high level of community engagement.”
Department of Conservation Geraldine Operations Manager Tony Preston is looking forward to getting stuck in.
“The genuine collaboration between partners and the community while developing the strategy has been fantastic, we look forward to working with the community and local businesses as we get stuck in to the planned work.”
Fiona Pimm, Chair of Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua reiterated the significance of the area.
“Te Rūnanga o Arowhenua are pleased to see the efforts and passion of many different interests come together in the signing of this strategy to protect Waitarakao.
“This is a special place with historic significance to our Arowhenua whānau and more recently a place of significance to Timaru settlers. It is a place where we share common values for protection of our environment.”
Next steps
Our Waitarakao is a collaboration between the community and the four partner organisations to deal with problems faced now in this unique coastal catchment, as well as planning ahead for a time when erosion may reduce the lagoon to a much smaller size.
The strategy includes actions to improve water quality, biodiversity and natural hazard resilience, as well as an ambitious long-term approach to create pockets of new wildlife habitat.
The strategy will be implemented through first steps and ongoing actions, which will be carried out with the help and involvement of the community.
Businesses, landowners and the community are invited to share resources and combine in positive actions in the catchment. Things like riparian plantings and pest control, sponsoring projects and donating resources and volunteer time.
Find our more about Our Waitarakao and how you can get involved.
Minister Weeds Wokeness Out Of MFAT
Source: Family First
Media Release – 12 March 2025
Family First NZ is welcoming moves by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters to ‘weed out the wokeness’ from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade as a result of an exposé by Family First on some of the content on the MFAT website and also its actions around the Pacific Islands.
In a Substack by CEO Bob McCoskrie by CEO Bob McCoskrie, the government body that should represent New Zealand to other governments, ensure security in the region, and negotiate trade agreements has become fully captive to DEI (diversity, equity & inclusion) & wokeness.
Their website zeroes in on sexual orientation and gender identity, intersectionality, “inclusion of our rainbow communities”, and they have even produced a glossary of reo Māori terminology for people of diverse SOGIESC – compliments of the taxpayer.
MFAT says: “In this way, we celebrate the place of rainbow communities in Aotearoa New Zealand as part of the diversity of the peoples of Te Moana-nui-a-Kiwa.”
The MFAT website says:
“Indigenous Takatapui LGBTQIA+ terminology are crucial for people-centred development in the Pacific as they honour and recognise the diverse cultural expressions and experiences of Indigenous peoples of Te Moana-nui-a-Kiwa…. It fosters cultural pride, self-determination, and social cohesion, promoting inclusive and sustainable development in the region.”
The then-Labour government also appointed an “Ambassador for Gender Equality (Pacific) / Tuia Tangata” in 2022 who travelled around Pacific countries pushing wokeness.
According to a report on the Newsroom website in 2022;
“Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced Louisa Wall’s appointment as a new ambassador for gender equality in the Pacific – less than a fortnight after Wall announced the end of her 14-year career in Parliament. The timing of Wall’s appointment, coupled with the well-established tensions between the outspoken MP and some within Labour, led to speculation that the role – to which she was appointed directly, without advertisement – had been created to move her on from Parliament.”
In response to the expose, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters released a statement this morning, saying:
“Since returning to the Foreign Affairs portfolio in November 2023, the Minister has been concerned about the impact that the woke agenda of his predecessor and the Ardern/Hipkins Government had on New Zealand’s diplomacy and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
Over the past 16 months, the Minister has made clear to successive Secretaries of Foreign Affairs and Trade that he expects MFAT and New Zealand’s diplomats to reflect the agenda of the current New Zealand Government. This has included a determination to remove references to the previous government’s policy priorities from the Ministry’s online publications.
While the Minister continues to hold New Zealand’s diplomats in the highest esteem, he is disappointed that there continue to be outdated references to discretionary legacy initiatives of the previous Labour Government on the MFAT website. He has instructed Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade Bede Corry to review the Ministry’s website and ensure its alignment with the Coalition Government’s agenda.
He looks forward to that review being conducted with a sense of urgency.”
It’s time that MFAT got back to their core activity – foreign affairs and trade, security in the region (including especially the Cook Islands), free trade deals – rather than ramming down DEI and Wokeism 101 down the throat of every other country.
This appears to be the target of the NZ First bill released last week, and should be supported by the coalition partners National and ACT.