Post

AM Edition: Top 10 Politics Articles on LiveNews.co.nz for August 24, 2026 – Full Text

AM Edition: Top 10 Politics Articles on LiveNews.co.nz for August 24, 2026 – Full Text

AM Edition: Here are the top 10 politics articles on LiveNews.co.nz for August 24, 2026 – Full Text

Generated August 24, 2026 06:00 NZST · Included sources: 9

1. Winston Peters: “Old Parties’ Fiscal Policy Devoid of Economic Strategy”

August 23, 2026

Source: New Zealand First

Today ladies and gentlemen we will discuss what we are going to do, but first let’s discuss what we have to deal with.

We must not forget what we inherited just three short years ago from an economically destructive and morally bereft Labour government, that left this country in an economic and social mess.

Source: New Zealand First

Today ladies and gentlemen we will discuss what we are going to do, but first let’s discuss what we have to deal with.

We must not forget what we inherited just three short years ago from an economically destructive and morally bereft Labour government, that left this country in an economic and social mess.

We inherited a broken economy, a fractured society, and a country on a road to social disaster. 

New Zealand’s debt skyrocketed, there were multiple policies with no allocated funding, racist co-governance and woke ideology had spread into legislation and throughout the public sector, universities, government departments, and schools – and ramraid after ramraid of ordinary shopping centres.

On their own, Labour had simply run roughshod over our country.

Labour left us:

·       A crumbling, underfunded, overwhelmed Health System.

An education system that had seen:

  • ·       a record number of children not attending school
  • ·       a record number of children failing basic standards
  • ·       an unmanageable number of schools without adequate classrooms, and

A Defence Force that had lost more than a third of its personnel over Labour’s three years.

An undermanned Police Force:

  • ·       haemorrhaging officers to Australia,
  • ·       massive shortages in recruitment,
  • ·       massive increases in crime, and
  • ·       youth ramraids and violence that was simply out of control.

Gang numbers that ballooned over the three years.

A cost-of-living crisis.

A housing crisis with skyrocketing prices and unprecedented numbers living in emergency hotels. Remember the Labour promise 100,000 new Kiwi-Build houses in ten years?

They left us a rate of child poverty even higher than when in 2021 Jacinda Ardern made herself the ‘Minister of Child Poverty’.

A mental health system that had seen more and more young people suffering with no help.

Crumbling infrastructure around the country with no plan, no funding, and no idea.

An unprecedented, uncontrollable level of immigration – over 133,000 entering in 2023 alone.

And during Covid, Labour left large numbers of people ostracised, demonised, shutdown and shutout, ignored and cancelled – all because those people fought for their right to say ‘no, we disagree.’

And they are hoping we have all forgotten about all of that. 

They are now actively banking on working with the wacky Greens and racist mess of the Māori Party. Labour care more about the seats that will give them a road to power, rather than the danger of who it is that will fill those seats.

The Labour Party of just twenty years ago would never entertain working with the likes of those in the current Greens or Māori Party. Those two parties are self-confessed Marxists and separatists, who have unworkable dangerous policies, and care more about globalist woke ideology and geopolitical wars happening ten thousand miles away than understanding the real world here in New Zealand.

A Labour, Greens, Māori Party, Opportunity government would be a total disaster for our country. 

The reality is, Labour long ago deserted the traditional blue-collar workers of New Zealand.

The movement of the party to the far left has caused longtime Labour voters to feel abandoned by a party that once stood for the ‘ordinary hard-working kiwi’. 

Instead, Labour now cares more about ‘social justice’ issues, socialist economics, and cultural separatism. 

That is why we ruled out working with Labour before the last election and why we are again ruling out working with the Labour Party in 2026.

For those voters thinking of changing the government, we suggest they carefully look at the four parties on the left, have a good look at their track record, then view the list of changes they want to make to New Zealand, and then ask this question – are these changes possible without inflicting irreversible harm on New Zealand. 

And we mean all four of the parties on the left because they will all be needed to form a government. 

It is not just a vote for Labour, or just a vote for the Greens, or just a vote for the Māori Party, or just a vote for the Opportunity Party.

They will all be needed to form a four-headed government combination the type we have never seen in this country’s history. 

Because within these four groups are communists, separatists and worse still they are all globalists. Which is a sure fire toxic concoction to turn our country into the Venezuela or Myanmar of the South Pacific.

That is not an exaggeration. 

We cannot be more serious in our warning that those parties of the left would destroy the New Zealand we know. Our values, our character, our economy, and our society.

In an interview last week, Ryan Bridge asked the Māori Party co-leader Rawiri Waititi why the Māori Seats are needed when this current government has the highest number of Māori in Cabinet on record – that’s even more Māori in Cabinet than when Labour and the Greens were in power.

Do you know what Rawiri said? 

“They may have whakapapa Māori, but they’re not kaupapa Māori based MPs.”

You know what that means don’t you? That Rawiri thinks that you’re the wrong kind of Māori if you don’t agree with what Rawiri thinks.

Here is someone leading a party that purports to ‘represent Māori interests’ in our country, yet only received three percent of the vote – out of a claimed seventeen percent population of Māori in New Zealand. That means less than one in eight Māori even voted for the Māori Party, so who do they represent exactly?

What is worse, is the Māori Party are now actively campaigning against people giving their party vote to the Māori Party.

They are wanting to manipulate the Māori vote by telling people to party vote for some other party on the left.

This is after giving everyone a lecture for decades on the importance of an independent Māori vote, and why other Māori MPs are not Māori enough.

All they have done is treat Māori with disdain, turn up to parliament once a month, and do a haka now and again in the House.

And who wants to sit with them at Cabinet with their extremist views? The Labour Party.

Another party the Labour Party wants to work with is the shiny new Opportunity Party.

The Opportunity Party wants homeowners to pay 1.75% of your home’s land value every year, that’s on top of your local rates.

Now you will have to pay an annual rent to the government.

And what did the leader of the Opportunity Party say when questioned about a couple on the pension, who worked hard and saved all their lives, bought a house for their future and their children’s future, who would now, under Opportunity Party, face a $20k land tax bill every year? She said, yes, they will have to downsize their house to afford it.

This is blisteringly ignorant. But it gets worse.

Because, do you know what that money would be used for? 

The $20k for an old couple on the pension? Infrastructure? Health? Education? Fuel security? Or food prices? No.

The $20k of land tax taken from the old couple, will be used to give everyone in New Zealand, working or not, a Universal Basic Income of $19,400 a year – for free, for life, even if you’re doing nothing.

Opportunity Party calls this ‘fairness’. 

New Zealand First calls it ‘communism’.

The question is, what are you as the voter, going to call it?

The Opportunity Party also wants to raise the youth court age to twenty-five years of age – however, when they were questioned on that, they quickly deleted the 25 year court age from their website and then said they haven’t figured out the new court age yet.

Something Opportunity also changed, only when they were found out, was that their constitution that stated the unelected board could veto caucus decisions. The leader, on television, revealed that she didn’t even know there was such a provision.

Their ‘redistribution of wealth’ and bludging tax policy doesn’t stack up, their ridiculous view on law and order doesn’t stack up, and their policy to intrench Te Tiriti into law along with a Māori Upper House in parliament is worse than the Māori Party’s racist policies.

The mainstream media promoted Opportunity Party campaign is falling apart everyday – just ask the Labour Party leader Helen Clark.

But who wants to sit across from them in Cabinet? The Labour Party.

As for the Green Party, they have proven themselves to be the nutbars they always were.

The Greens want an $88 billion debt increase, and have a new policy bribe to give $2.4 billion to Marae – without any oversight or audit.

If you’re a Māori in this room today, tell us honestly, what does that reflect about what they think of you?

This is inverse racism of the worst sort. They think they can use a bribe to get your vote. Does that reflect respect for you or sheer contempt?

The Greens care more about a geopolitical war happening ten thousand miles away that they know nothing about, than they do about what is happening in their own country.

The are obsessed with race, gender, pronouns, and protests, performative politics, virtue signalling, and woke cancel culture, and they have lost sight of what their party once stood for.

They are no longer worried about the environment like Rod Donald and Jeanette Fitzsimons once were – they have turned into a bunch of weirdo globalists who like to sanctimoniously lecture people – while wearing costumes from some other country.

And who wants to sit across the Cabinet table with them? The Labour Party.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the stark truth. The Labour Party that you once knew, perhaps even supported, is no more.

That party is gone. All of these polices and parties they are willing to support are proof of that.

Can you imagine Helen Clark or Michael Cullen, or Bob Tizard or Peter Frazer signing up to this?

These parties on the left are not people who see New Zealand as one people, one country, one flag, one law, or who believe in fundamental kiwi values like hard work, ambition, and personal responsibility.

These are people who believe in a separatist society, and who want to borrow, tax, and spend – but have zero economic credentials, or even vision, to deliver growth.

Chris Hipkins and Labour are willing to work with parties like Opportunity, Greens, and the Māori Party because Labour care more about the number of seats that will give them power, rather than the danger of who it is they will share power with.

Ladies and gentlemen, part of New Zealand First’s mission is to keep these dangerous lefties out of power.

 

New Zealand Needs Bold Policies

A country that does not control its energy, essential infrastructure, banking competition, or strategic supply chains cannot control the cost of living.

There is only one political party in parliament that understands that and that party is New Zealand First.

That’s why we have announced practical, logical and workable policies to break up the power companies’ monopoly, and drive power prices down.

We have announced practical, logical and workable policies to split the supermarket duopoly, and drive food prices down.

We have announced practical, logical, and workable polices to re-establish a competitive New Zealand owned state bank, to drive banking charges down.

We have announced polices to return mining royalties, created in the regions, back to the regions.

We have announced establishing a proper transparent inquiry into those who were injured by the Covid 19 vaccine – so we can find out exactly what happened, who was responsible, and publicly hold them to account.

And we are going to further inquire into how over 311,000 twelve to seventeen year olds got the second vaccine when the then Prime Minister Ardern, and two Ministers in charge Hipkins and Verrill, were advised not to.

Ladies and gentlemen, the fact that this is not headlining in the mainstream media or in parliament is testimony to how the establishment, media and political, almost completely conformed to the “podium of truth”.

The reason why you aren’t seeing any headlines is that both the media and politicians are exposed to their wanton compliance and obedience in how they mislead the public of New Zealand – this is a conspiracy.

We are going to expose the cover-up on this issue by the other political parties and the establishment who all signed a document not to talk to the protesters.

 

KiwiSaver and Future Fund

We announced our KiwiSaver policy of making it compulsory with automatic $1000 sign-up at birth. It means the day a baby is born it gets $1000 in its account to start saving.

We have announced our policy is to establish a $100 billion Future Fund that will invest in a thirty-year infrastructure plan for our country. And that’s where we are going to get the money to build the projects that we promise in our country.

 

Paris Agreement 

We have also announced that we will pull out of the failing Paris Agreement that is senselessly hamstringing our economy.

 

Loose Electoral Laws

New Zealand has one of the loosest electoral laws in the world, and that is why we have announced a policy to ensure that by 2029 only citizens are allowed to vote in our country.

 

Making NZ Energy Independent 

At our Campaign Launch, we announced a policy to invest $1billion to start exploring our gas and oil reserves in our deep-sea basins so we can own and export our own oil and gas – we need to be independent from events like in the Strait of Hormuz.

We have announced the ‘Kiwi Kids Grant’ that will support New Zealand citizens raising their first three children, through the first three years of their lives – $5000 per child for each of the three years.

We have also announced New Zealand First is proposing changes to the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act to incentivise investment in value-added dairy manufacturing in New Zealand.

We are giving certainty for any business willing to manufacture dairy products in New Zealand.

We want industry in New Zealand. If investors want to invest more in higher-value manufacturing, then our economic settings should welcome them.

Build the factories. Build the brands. Take New Zealand dairy products to the world.

 

Experience Matters Most

New Zealand First started our long campaign in March this year and we have been packing the halls around the country every week delivering the message to thousands of kiwis that we are focussed on two things – bold policies our country needs for a real change, and the fight for ordinary hard working kiwis against the establishment, the elites, and the status quo.

Experience and leadership has never mattered more.

We need leaders of the next government to say the things that people are thinking without fear or favour – even the things that might be unpopular.

New Zealand needs strong leadership who are not afraid to be strong on important issues.

And we don’t need weak leaders who don’t understand New Zealand values.

We can’t go on allowing the two old parties to tinker round the edges of big issues and do nothing but manage the decline of our country.

These two old parties have spent the last forty years arguing over fiscal or spending policy whilst having no economic strategy to grow New Zealand’s Gross Domestic Product, to lift your wages and your standard of living.

The old parties’ fiscal policies have been devoid of economic strategy.

Only one party has an understanding of the economic strategy that is required, even to the extent to when we criticised the then National Party’s spending policy and lack of economic strategy, the New Zealand First leader was expelled from the National Party caucus.

 

Value of Citizenship

New Zealand needs to start viewing our citizenship as most other countries around the world do – as a privilege that comes with special and unique rights. 

This does not take away from migrants the ability to move here and help build our country, from showing total commitment and patriotism for New Zealand by becoming a citizen. 

We have massively allowed so many of our standards to drop.

Even the most basic of privileges and rights in any country like voting has in our country become more like an expectation for anyone, rather than a unique right for New Zealanders.

Ladies and gentlemen, why do so many ‘apologetic globalists’ act shocked and dismayed that a political party is wanting to ensure that citizenship actually mean something? 

There is a difference in this election. Kiwis are looking at what parties are offering as their values and principles in these uncertain times.

 

NZFirst Party of Conservatism, Patriotism, Nationalism

We signed a coalition agreement to govern with stability and experience three years ago – and we have kept our word. 

New Zealand First brings what is too often missing in politics – experience and common sense. 

New Zealand First brings a commitment to New Zealand industry, to manufacturing, to jobs right here for our own people.

 

 

Immigration Policy

New Zealand First brings commonsense to immigration policy – where we allow in people that we need, not people who need us.

We believe in infrastructure before imported population growth, not afterwards, and infrastructure focused on fixing what’s broken, not flash upgrades and vanity projects.

And we believe in policies that despite immigration preserve the pre-eminence of our culture – and not the threat that we are seeing overseas of imported cultures taking over New Zealand.

New Zealand First fights for traditional kiwi conservative values – where hard work should be rewarded, where job security and home ownership underpins a stable family life. 

We want a country where young people aren’t worried about their family’s future, or where they see better opportunities overseas.

We in 2023 inherited an economic nightmare. But too few government members understood that. 

We knew the economic crisis would take years to fix. Our coalition colleagues said they could fix it in three years – and hence the public’s confusion as to what is happening now. 

This pivotal election voters want to hear a clear and unified message. 

First, to turn the economy around and that we are going to win, and take New Zealand back to being a leading economy again.

 

Challenging the Status Quo

The greatest threat to this blind ideology, to social elitism, and to the status quo, is New Zealand First.

And the country we are defending is called New Zealand – it’s in our party’s name.

We are asking you to make a choice with our future generations in mind.

Take back control from the Wellington bubble.

Take back control from those who choose to be CV politicians, where they are here one day, “no more gas in the tank”, and are gone the next – taking with them a rolodex of international jobs, speaking circuits, or book tours, looking back over their shoulder at New Zealand’s decline – which they caused. 

New Zealand First, from our launch thirty-three years ago, has been battling that elitist status quo. No one can deny that. On issue after issue that needed public exposure, the rest remain silent. When others wouldn’t raise a finger, we have raised the roof.

 

Conclusion 

Ladies and gentlemen, we are all here because we love our country, and we are proud of it.

True democracy is a rare flower in the history of humanity.

Down thousands of years living in democracy with freedom is not common. 

We have inherited a free country that our forebears fought and died for, and it’s our job to preserve it.

But only if we are proud of what we have inherited can we come together and move forward to shape the vision of our country’s future.

We live in a country that, at its core, traditional New Zealand values once saw us amongst the world’s leaders – hard work, fair pay, valuing our citizenship, building a sense of community, and knowing who we are as kiwis.

We must remember, New Zealand is the beneficiary of Western values, democracy, and the rule of law. And the advancement and enhancement of those principles have only occurred in those societies that have united together as one people – and who celebrate their nationhood instead of perpetuating division.

There is a lot of uncertainty around the world and at home, but we must keep hope alive that, with hard work and perseverance, tomorrow will be better.

New Zealand First is nationalist, patriotic, and socially conservative values that we fight for. 

It hasn’t been easy – but things in life worth doing never are. 

We must never forget that challenge.

We must never stop believing in New Zealand.

That is our vision and that is our mission.

To protect, to save, and to restore New Zealand’s place at the top of the world.

By putting New Zealand and New Zealanders first.

We are asking you to join us – and Party Vote New Zealand First. 

Original source: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/08/23/winston-peters-old-parties-fiscal-policy-devoid-of-economic-strategy/

Back to index · Read original article


2. 40 Teams Gather in Hong Kong to Compete in the “AI x Cybersecurity Challenge”

August 23, 2026

Source: Media Outreach

HONG KONG SAR – Media OutReach Newswire – 23 August 2026 – The AI x Cybersecurity Challenge, jointly organised by the Digital Policy Office of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, the Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies, the Hong Kong Cybersecurity Professional Association, and China Mobile Hong Kong Company Limited, and co-organised by Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited, the Cyber Security and Technology Crime Bureau of the Hong Kong Police Force, the Hong Kong Productivity Council, Venustech Group Inc., and Hong Kong Cloud Peak Technology Co., Limited, held the Finals today.

Following a 12-hour online qualifying round, a total of 40 teams advanced to the Final Competition, including 20 teams from the Chinese Mainland, 18 from Hong Kong, and two from overseas regions. The Challenge adopts an innovative AI-Driven Dual (AID) competition format, in which artificial intelligence (AI) executes the competition and enables autonomous defence by AI agents. Teams of up to three members showcase their capabilities in leveraging AI technologies for automated vulnerability discovery and exploitation, competing for total prize money of HK$180,000.

Source: Media Outreach

Autonomous AI Attack-and-Defence Demonstrates Next-Generation Cybersecurity Talent and Advance Regional Digital Security Talent Development

HONG KONG SAR – Media OutReach Newswire – 23 August 2026 – The AI x Cybersecurity Challenge, jointly organised by the Digital Policy Office of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government, the Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies, the Hong Kong Cybersecurity Professional Association, and China Mobile Hong Kong Company Limited, and co-organised by Hong Kong Cyberport Management Company Limited, the Cyber Security and Technology Crime Bureau of the Hong Kong Police Force, the Hong Kong Productivity Council, Venustech Group Inc., and Hong Kong Cloud Peak Technology Co., Limited, held the Finals today.

Following a 12-hour online qualifying round, a total of 40 teams advanced to the Final Competition, including 20 teams from the Chinese Mainland, 18 from Hong Kong, and two from overseas regions. The Challenge adopts an innovative AI-Driven Dual (AID) competition format, in which artificial intelligence (AI) executes the competition and enables autonomous defence by AI agents. Teams of up to three members showcase their capabilities in leveraging AI technologies for automated vulnerability discovery and exploitation, competing for total prize money of HK$180,000.

The event brings together representatives from Government, industry, academia and research organisations to witness the latest developments in AI-powered cybersecurity innovation. Officiating guests at the Opening Ceremony included Professor SUN Dong, JP, Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry, Mr LI Shuguang, Director-General of the General Office of the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in the HKSAR, Mr WANG Jiang, Director-General of the Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies, Mr Daniel CHEUNG, JP, Acting Commissioner for Digital Policy, Mr WANG Minwei, Deputy Director of the Cyberspace Administration of Guangdong Province, Dr Rocky CHENG, JP, President of the Hong Kong Cybersecurity Professional Association, and Ms SHI Xiaoping, Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Hong Kong Company Limited.

In his opening remarks, the Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry, Professor Sun Dong, said that AI is reshaping every aspect of people’s life at a breathtaking speed. He noted that although innovation may at times bring new threats, these same technologies can also spur defensive capabilities. As such, the Government champions an “AI versus AI” strategy, leveraging AI to forge the strongest shields to effectively manage risks associated with the use of AI.

Professor Sun added that the Government is continuously strengthening related policies, guidelines and ethical frameworks, as well as conducting regular cyber-attack-and-defence drills to better prepare for cybersecurity readiness. Through multi-pronged efforts, the Government hopes to guide society to apply AI responsibly, foster a healthy ecosystem, and strengthen city-wide resilience in face of cyber attacks.

Addressing AI-Era Cybersecurity Challenges Through Talent Development

The rapid advancement of AI is reshaping the global cybersecurity landscape. AI has evolved from a supporting tool for security analysis and threat monitoring into a technology capable of autonomously constructing attack chains and bypassing existing defence mechanisms. This has significantly lowered the technical barriers to cyberattacks, making sophisticated attack techniques more automated and accessible. Threat actors can leverage AI for intelligent vulnerability discovery, automated penetration testing, and even the creation of highly convincing deepfake content, enabling stealthier and more persistent cyberattacks.

As emerging threats such as model security risks, data poisoning, model theft, phishing attacks, supply chain vulnerabilities and automated exploitation continue to evolve, the demand for interdisciplinary talent with expertise in both AI and cybersecurity is becoming increasingly urgent. In response, the organisers aim to promote the practical application of AI technologies through this hands-on competition while cultivating a new generation of cybersecurity professionals equipped with cross-disciplinary expertise.

AI-Driven Attack-and-Defence Competition Platform

Unlike traditional Capture the Flag (CTF) competitions, this year’s Challenge adopts an innovative AI-Driven (AID) competition format. Participating teams leverage AI-powered automated systems to analyse the competition environment provided by the organisers, identify vulnerabilities and exploit them. The automated capabilities of the AI agents include information gathering, vulnerability discovery and flag submission. The competition environment incorporates both vulnerabilities found in real-world scenarios and simulated zero-day vulnerabilities that may exist in software systems.

The challenge design draws on concepts from international cybersecurity competitions and incorporates practical operating scenarios as well as simulated zero-day attack-and-defence environments, testing participants’ ability to apply AI technologies to real-world cybersecurity challenges. The Challenge aims to enhance participants’ practical attack-and-defence experience and innovation capabilities, promote the research and application of AI security technologies, and nurture a new generation of cybersecurity talent equipped with both strategic vision and practical expertise. Through these efforts, the competition seeks to strengthen capabilities in addressing AI-driven cyber threats.

Government, Industry, Academia and Research Communities Join Forces to Advance AI Security

This year’s Challenge brings together stakeholders from government, industry and research institutions to drive innovation in AI security technologies, strengthen cybersecurity capabilities and cultivate future talent.

Mr Wang Jiang, Director-General of the Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies, said, “AI technologies are reshaping the global cyber attack-and-defence landscape. While they lower the barriers to cyberattacks, they also drive the evolution of security protection from reactive response to proactive and intelligent defence. In this technological contest, using technology to counter technology has become an inevitable trend. By focusing on practical AI attack-and-defence capabilities, this competition aims to identify emerging talent and contribute to building a more trustworthy and intelligent cyberspace.”

Ms Shi Xiaoping, Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Hong Kong Company Limited, said, “As one of the organisers of this competition, China Mobile Hong Kong has devoted substantial resources to building an innovative AI attack-and-defence competition platform. Through continuous technology investment and ecosystem development, we actively fulfil our corporate social responsibility while showcasing Hong Kong’s innovation and leadership in AI cybersecurity to the world.”

Dr Rocky CHENG, JP, President of the Hong Kong Cybersecurity Professional Association, concluded, “AI-driven cyberattacks and agentic AI-related risks have emerged as some of the most significant cybersecurity threats today. Against this backdrop, cultivating interdisciplinary talent with expertise in AI system design, development and practical attack-and-defence capabilities has become an important pillar in strengthening Hong Kong’s overall cyber resilience.”

The Awards Presentation Ceremony will be held in late September 2026 during the China Cybersecurity Week to recognise teams that have demonstrated outstanding performance in the competition. The organisers encourage enterprises and organisations to continuously strengthen their cybersecurity governance, regularly review information system risks, enhance data protection measures and improve cyber incident response capabilities. Young talents are also encouraged to pursue opportunities in artificial intelligence and cybersecurity, developing their expertise through training, professional certifications and hands-on competitions. Members of the public and organisations may also make use of the cybersecurity information, training programmes and support services provided by the Hong Kong Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Centre (HKCERT) and other relevant organisations, helping to foster a safer, more secure and trustworthy digital ecosystem.

Please download the high-res photos HERE.

Photo Captions:

1. The Finals of the AI x Cybersecurity Challenge.
2. Officiating guests, including Dr Rocky CHENG, JP, President of the Hong Kong Cybersecurity Professional Association,Mr Daniel CHEUNG, JP, Acting Commissioner for Digital Policy, Mr LI Shuguang, Director-General of the General Office of the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in the HKSAR, Professor SUN Dong, JP, Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry, Mr Wang Jiang, Director-General of the Chinese Academy of Cyberspace Studies, Mr WANG Minwei, Deputy Director of the Cyberspace Administration of Guangdong Province and Ms Shi Xiaoping, Director and Chief Executive Officer of China Mobile Hong Kong Company Limited (from left to right) preside over the launch ceremony of the AI x Cybersecurity Challenge, marking the official commencement of the competition.
3. Officiating guests and representatives of the organisers and co-organisers, including Hong Kong Productivity Council, pose for a group photo at the Opening Ceremony, demonstrating their shared commitment to advancing innovation in AI and cybersecurity and nurturing regional AI security talent.
4. Professor Sun Dong, JP, Secretary for Innovation, Technology and Industry, delivers a speech at the Opening Ceremony, pointing out that AI is reshaping every aspect of people’s life at a breathtaking speed. He noted that although innovation may at times bring new threats, these same technologies can also spur defensive capabilities. As such, the Government champions an “AI versus AI” strategy, leveraging AI to forge the strongest shields to effectively manage risks associated with the use of AI.
5. The 40 finalist teams showcase innovative AI-driven cybersecurity technologies by independently designing and deploying autonomous AI agents to compete in a simulated attack-and-defence environment.

About the Hong Kong Productivity Council

The Hong Kong Productivity Council (HKPC) is a statutory body established in 1967, dedicated to enhancing the productivity and competitiveness of Hong Kong enterprises through world-class applied R&D, innovative technology services, and integrated manufacturing solutions. As a market-oriented, international R&D organisation, HKPC leverages its deep expertise and extensive industry experience in key areas such as AI, advanced manufacturing, life and health technology, green technology and new energy to drive new industrialisation and support the growth of emerging and future industries.

HKPC focuses on addressing businesses challenges and industrial technology needs, promoting the full integration between technological and industrial innovation. Through technology transfer, product innovation, intellectual property protection and commercialisation of R&D outcomes, the Council fosters collaboration with the local business community as well as top global R&D institutions, delivering added value to industries and advancing the development of new productive forces. HKPC’s world-class R&D achievements have been widely recognised over the years, winning an array of local and overseas accolades, reinforcing Hong Kong’s role as an international innovation and technology centre and a smart city.

To help enterprises capitalise on Hong Kong’s strengths in international connectivity to expand into global markets, HKPC offers comprehensive overseas expansion services tailored to critical areas including product development, technology, manufacturing, and management, enabling businesses to successfully go global from Hong Kong.

HKPC is also committed to providing timely and practical support to SMEs and startups with timely and practical , assisting them in accessing Government funding programmes. Through its FutureSkills training initiatives, HKPC helps both industry and academia stay ahead in latest digital and STEM technologies, nurturing a future-ready talent pool for Hong Kong.

For more information, please visit HKPC’s website: www.hkpc.org/en.

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

– Published and distributed with permission of Media-Outreach.com.

Back to index · Read original article


3. PSA – Labour urged to commit to rolling back public service cuts

August 23, 2026

Source: PSA

The Public Service Association is calling on Labour to clearly commit to reversing the National led Government’s plans to cut almost 9,000 public service jobs over the next three years.
Today’s release of Labour’s fiscal strategy stated that ‘strong public services are an investment in New Zealand’s future’.
“As our population ages and the impacts of climate change are felt, we need a strong public service, we need to see Labour commit to reversing public service cuts,” said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
“The National-led Government has embarked on an unprecedented assault on the public service and if re-elected would embark on another round of savage and dangerous cuts, as part of its own short sighted fiscal plan.
“These cuts are arbitrary and underpinned by no clear strategy except to save money, they would result in thousands of public servants losing their jobs and cause further serious and irreversible damage to public services that New Zealanders rely on.
“Labour must address this as the election looms. We need a clear commitment from Labour in its fiscal plan that it will not do what National is promising, relying on mergers and AI to justify further destruction of public services and dismissals of public servants.
“Public servants are doing important work and are critical to help us face our future challenges.”
The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

MIL OSI

Back to index · Read original article


4. MSF Statement on Israeli Military’s decision to deny a criminal investigation into MSF killings and injuries

August 21, 2026

Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

21 August

Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) strongly condemns the decision by the Israeli Military Advocate General (MAG) to close, without opening a criminal investigation, the cases MSF itself submitted for review: the multiple attacks on an MSF convoy in Gaza City in November 2023 that killed two, and the February 2024 strike on an MSF shelter in Khan Younis that killed two and injured six.

Source: Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF)

21 August

Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) strongly condemns the decision by the Israeli Military Advocate General (MAG) to close, without opening a criminal investigation, the cases MSF itself submitted for review: the multiple attacks on an MSF convoy in Gaza City in November 2023 that killed two, and the February 2024 strike on an MSF shelter in Khan Younis that killed two and injured six.

Unfortunately, this does not come as a surprise. These responses come nearly two years after MSF’s request was submitted, which was followed by a submission to the Israeli High Court of Justice challenging the MAG’s failure to provide any answer to our formal requests.

This is not justice. Two years of silence, followed by closures that raise more questions than they answer, is unacceptable. However, it is the predictable output of a military apparatus investigating itself: a system which has demonstrated itself unwilling to respond to the extent of violations that may amount to war crimes emerging from Gaza.

MSF staff and their family members are dead. Their names are known. Their locations were shared. Their vehicles were identified. We have always maintained that all elements point to a clear responsibility of the Israeli army for the deadly attacks. And yet, those responsible for their deaths have declined to pursue any criminal investigation.

With this decision, the MAG has made clear that there is no prospect of accountability within the Israeli legal system for the killing of our staff, just as there has been no accountability for Israel’s ongoing genocide against Palestinians.

A total of 15 MSF staff members have been killed in Gaza by Israeli forces since October 2023. This is just a fraction of the 1,700 healthcare workers who have been killed in that time. Israeli forces continue to kill civilians with impunity, something these decisions by the MAG, make clear.

The decision to ‘close’ these incidents must be understood in their proper context: in Gaza, tens of thousands of Palestinians have been killed. Healthcare facilities have been destroyed. Humanitarian convoys have been struck. Journalists, medical personnel, UN personnel, and aid workers have been killed in numbers unprecedented in any recent conflict.

MSF reaffirms what it has stated since the beginning of this violence: there is no military objective that justifies the wholesale sacrifice of civilians. And there is no internal military review that can substitute for genuine, independent, and impartial accountability.

We demand that the cases involving our colleagues be reviewed by an impartial investigative body.

To our colleagues we have lost, and to the countless civilians and humanitarian workers who have perished in Gaza: we will not let your deaths be filed away as procedural inevitabilities. You deserved protection. You deserve justice.

MSF is an international, medical, humanitarian organisation that delivers medical care to people in need, regardless of their origin, religion, or political affiliation. MSF Australia was established in 1995 and is one of 24 international MSF sections committed to delivering medical humanitarian assistance to people in crisis. Every year more than 120 Australians and New Zealanders go on assignment with Médecins Sans Frontières working as: doctors, midwives, psychologists, laboratory technicians, human resource/finance coordinators, pharmacists, mental health specialists and logisticians. MSF delivers medical care based on need alone and operates independently of government, religion or economic influence and irrespective of race, religion or gender.

https://msf.org.au

MIL OSI

Back to index · Read original article


5. Health (Offensive Trades Removal) Order 2026

August 20, 2026

Source: New Zealand Ministry of Health

Good law-making: 9(i)

The importance of consulting, to the extent that is reasonably practicable, the persons or representatives of the persons that the responsible agency considers will be directly and materially affected by the legislation

No

Source: New Zealand Ministry of Health

Publication date:
13 August 2026

Good law-making: 9(i)

The importance of consulting, to the extent that is reasonably practicable, the persons or representatives of the persons that the responsible agency considers will be directly and materially affected by the legislation

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

Targeted engagement was undertaken with Taupō District Council, Central Hawke’s Bay District Council, and the New Zealand Institute of Environmental Health. Information was also sought from Auckland City Council, Wellington City Council, Christchurch City Council, and Dunedin City Council during development of this policy. 

Good law-making: 9(j)

The importance of carefully evaluating—

  • the issue concerned; and
  • the effectiveness of any relevant existing legislation and common law; and
  • whether the public interest requires that the issue be addressed; and
  • any options (including non-legislative options) that are reasonably available for addressing the issue; and
  • who is likely to benefit, and who is likely to suffer a detriment, from the legislation

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council removing listed offensive trades from Schedule 3 of the Health Act is developed following a clear identification of the regulatory problem, an assessment of the effectiveness of other existing regulatory regimes for regulating the listed offensive trades, and consideration of other options. 

There is a clear case that removing listed offensive trades is in the public interest as it removes unnecessary regulatory burden for businesses who are classified as carrying out an offensive trade. The Order in Council is coherent with existing law and supported by analysis of distributional impacts. This reflects a good law-making process. 

Good law-making: 9(k)

The importance of the responsible agency identifying and developing effective arrangements for implementing the legislation

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

A communication plan has been developed by the Ministry for Regulation to inform businesses of the change. 

Good law-making: 9(l)

Legislation should be expected to produce benefits that exceed the costs of the legislation to the public or persons

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council proceeds based on a transparent assessment of expected costs and benefits, with expected cost savings and no perceived unintended consequences as a result of the policy change. 

Good law-making: 9(m)

Legislation should be the most effective, efficient, and proportionate response to the issue concerned that is available

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council was identified by the Ministry for Regulation and the Ministry of Health as the best policy option to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden, as the listed offensive trades are already sufficiently regulated under other existing regulatory regimes. 

Rule of Law: 9(a)(i)

The law should be clear and accessible

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council is straightforward and accessible to those who it affects. It simply removes the 19 offensive trades listed in Schedule 3 of the Health Act 1956, thereby removing the associated registration requirements under the Health (Registration of Premises) Regulations 1966. The amendment does not introduce new obligations, technical concepts, or regulatory requirements. Businesses, local authorities, and other affected parties can readily understand its effect: offensive trades will no longer be required to register with local authorities as under the current regime.

Rule of Law: 9(a)(ii)

The law should not adversely affect rights and liberties, or impose obligations, retrospectively

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council removes the 19 offensive trades listed in Schedule 3 of the Health Act 1956 on a prospective basis. It does not alter the legal effect of past actions, retrospectively impose penalties, invalidate previous registrations, or create new liabilities for conduct that was lawful when it occurred.

Rule of Law: 9(a)(iii)

Every person is equal before the law

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

The Order in Council applies equally to all people and entities carrying out trades currently listed as offensive trades in Schedule 3 of the Health Act 1956, and does not create any exemptions, immunities, or special treatment for the Crown or other public bodies. Existing regulatory frameworks and public health powers will continue to apply in the same manner to all relevant parties. 

Rule of Law: 9(a)(iv)

There should be an independent impartial judiciary

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not affect judicial appointments or independence and does not confer judicial functions on any person. 

Rule of Law: 9(a)(v)

Issues of legal right and liability should be resolved by the application of law, rather than the exercise of administrative discretion

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council only removes trades listed in Schedule 3 and does not delegate any authority to an administrative body such as a minister or a regulator to resolve issues relating to legal rights and abilities.

Liberties: 9(b)

Legislation should not unduly diminish a person’s liberty, personal security, freedom of choice or action, or rights to own, use, and dispose of property, except as is necessary to provide for, or protect, any such liberty, freedom, or right of another person

Inconsistency identified?

No

Summary of agency analysis

Through removal of the 19 offensive trades listed in Schedule 3 of the Health Act 1956, these trades will not be required to register with local authorities under the Health (Registration of Premises) Regulations 1966. This reduces regulatory requirements, annual fees, and compliance obligations for affected businesses, thereby increasing freedom of action rather than imposing additional restrictions. The Ministry of Health’s assessment found that public health risks associated with these trades are appropriately managed through other regulatory frameworks and existing powers under the Health Act 1956 to address nuisance and public health risks.

Taking of property: 9(c)

Legislation should not take or severely impair, or authorise the taking or severe impairment of, property without the consent of the owner unless—

  • there is a good justification for the taking or severe impairment; and
  • fair compensation for the taking or severe impairment is provided to the owner; and
  • the compensation is provided, to the extent practicable, by or on behalf of the persons who obtain the benefit of the taking or severe impairment

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not take, severely impair or authorise the taking or severe impairment of property. 

Taxes, fees and levies: 9(d)

The importance of maintaining consistency with section 22(a) of the Constitution Act 1996 (Parliamentary control of taxation)

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not impose or increase any tax, fee, levy, or other charge.

Taxes, fees and levies: 9(e)

Legislation should impose, or authorise the imposition of, a fee for goods or services only if the amount of the fee bears a proper relation to the cost of providing the good or service to which it relates

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not impose or authorise any new fees. Rather, it removes the requirement for businesses to pay an existing fee by decoupling these trades from registration requirements.

Taxes, fees and levies: 9(f)

Legislation should impose, or authorise the imposition of, a levy to fund an objective or a function only if the amount of the levy is reasonable in relation to both—

  • the benefits that the class of payers is likely to derive, or the risks attributable to the class, in connection with the objective or function; and
  • the costs of efficiently achieving the objective or providing the function

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not impose, or authorise the imposition of, a levy.

Role of courts: 9(g)

Legislation should preserve the courts’ constitutional role of ascertaining the meaning of legislation

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not limit court’s ability to interpret legislation or interfere with judicial proceeding. The courts will continue to exercise their ordinary role in interpreting and applying the Health Act 1956 and other relevant legislation.

Role of courts: 9(h)

Legislation should make rights and liberties, or obligations, dependent on administrative power only if the power is sufficiently defined and subject to appropriate review

Inconsistency identified?

Not applicable

Summary of agency analysis

Not applicable as the Order in Council does not create any new administrative powers or allow exercise of powers that can interfere with rights, liberties, or obligations.

Original source: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/08/20/health-offensive-trades-removal-order-2026/

Back to index · Read original article


6. PSA calls on Public Service Commission to withdraw te reo Māori parade guidance

August 21, 2026

Source: Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi

The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is deeply concerned by guidance recently issued by the Public Service Commission that discourages public servants from attending the annual Te Wiki o te Reo Māori parade.

The union is warning that the guidance could have a chilling effect on public servants’ work to protect and promote te reo Māori.

Source: Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi

The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is deeply concerned by guidance recently issued by the Public Service Commission that discourages public servants from attending the annual Te Wiki o te Reo Māori parade.

The union is warning that the guidance could have a chilling effect on public servants’ work to protect and promote te reo Māori.

“We are calling on Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche to withdraw this flawed guidance and send a clear public message that public servants are encouraged to attend the parade,” said PSA Te Kaihautū Māori Jack McDonald.

“For a number of years many public service departments have appropriately supported their employees to participate in these parades. Departments have a duty to promote te reo Māori and support its revitalisation.

“Attending an event organised by Te Taura Whiri i te Reo Māori is entirely consistent with a public servant’s obligations and the policies their employers are required to operate under the Public Service Act.

“The Crown has a commitment under Te Ture mō Te Reo Māori 2016 to work in partnership with Māori to actively protect and promote te reo Māori for future generations. Attendance at the parade by public servants during work hours should therefore be expected and encouraged.

“The Commission’s guidance is also in flagrant disregard of recent findings from the Waitangi Tribunal’s report on the Te Reo in the Public Sector Urgent Inquiry, including that the Crown is required to take active steps to redress the vulnerable state of te reo Māori, and that the Crown must do more to upskill the public service in te reo Māori.

“It is very clear that the Public Service Commission should be supporting participation in events that promote and celebrate te reo Māori, not discouraging it. The Commissioner needs to urgently with the guidance to ensure that it does not have a chilling effect on the promotion of te reo Māori in the public service,” said McDonald.

The Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi is Aotearoa New Zealand’s largest trade union, representing and supporting more than 95,000 workers across central government, state-owned enterprises, local councils, health boards and community groups.

MIL OSI

Back to index · Read original article


7. NZPFU rejects options to progress settlement of collective agreement negotiations

August 21, 2026

Source: Fire and Emergency New Zealand

Fire and Emergency is disappointed the New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union (NZPFU) has rejected its request to explore arbitration as a way to bring their long-running collective agreement negotiations to a conclusion.

“We have been working in good faith, utilising all of the options available under the Employment Relations Act to try and reach a sustainable settlement with the NZPFU,” Deputy Chief Executive People Janine Hearn says.

Source: Fire and Emergency New Zealand

Fire and Emergency is disappointed the New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union (NZPFU) has rejected its request to explore arbitration as a way to bring their long-running collective agreement negotiations to a conclusion.

“We have been working in good faith, utilising all of the options available under the Employment Relations Act to try and reach a sustainable settlement with the NZPFU,” Deputy Chief Executive People Janine Hearn says.

“Most recently, we’ve been in a facilitation process through the Employment Relations Authority to try to resolve the dispute. As part of that process, the independent facilitator again asked each party to exchange its current proposal for settlement after a prior refusal by the NZPFU. Fire and Emergency agreed to do so, but the NZPFU, once again, did not.

“After a long period of bargaining, that step would have allowed both parties to put forward fair and reasonable proposals that could help settle the dispute. The NZPFU’s stance is extremely disappointing and again delays a sustainable settlement that would mean we can get on with keeping our communities safe.

“Unfortunately, a significant gap remains between us. Our most recent offer would have delivered a 2.2 percent increase from 1 December 2025 and a 2.2 percent from 1 January 2027 over a 24-month term to the end of November 2027. This was at a cost of $50 million over four years and compares favourably with other public sector settlements.

“By comparison, the NZPFU’s settlement proposal was for more than $130 million over the same period. That is not financially realistic at a time when we also have to keep investing in the trucks and equipment our people need to do their jobs safely.

“The ERA has resolved to reconvene facilitation, which we’ve agreed to and will be approaching with an open mind and in good faith to try and reach a settlement.

“The NZPFU’s continued refusal to agree to steps that could progress bargaining only serves to erode the benefits their members will receive from an eventual settlement. The Government’s Workforce Policy Statement is clear that settlements are to avoid backdating any components of adjustments to pay and conditions.

“Arbitration would have involved an independent arbitrator or arbitration panel considering the positions of both parties and making a decision on the matters referred.

“Given the significant gap between the parties, the protracted nature of negotiations, the impact on our team members and the risk to the wider community, we believe we have an obligation to explore every possible option for reaching settlement.

“We were hopeful the NZPFU would agree to discuss this process so we can continue focusing on keeping our communities safe,” Janine Hearn says.

MIL OSI

Back to index · Read original article


8. Toxic timber chemical legacy shows why health and safety rights are human rights

August 20, 2026

Source: NZCTU

The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi welcomes a new report from the Human Rights Commission detailing the intergenerational impact of PCP use in the timber industry, including on timber workers, their whānau, and their communities.

“The CTU fully supports the report’s findings. Workers in the timber industry deserve a comprehensive redress that includes specialist healthcare, fair compensation, and recognition of the intergenerational harm caused to their whānau,” says NZCTU Vice-President Māori Aubrey Wilkinson

Source: NZCTU

The New Zealand Council of Trade Unions Te Kauae Kaimahi welcomes a new report from the Human Rights Commission detailing the intergenerational impact of PCP use in the timber industry, including on timber workers, their whānau, and their communities.

“The CTU fully supports the report’s findings. Workers in the timber industry deserve a comprehensive redress that includes specialist healthcare, fair compensation, and recognition of the intergenerational harm caused to their whānau,” says NZCTU Vice-President Māori Aubrey Wilkinson

The highly toxic chemical PCP was widely used in the timber industry between 1930 and 1988. Timber workers were exposed through inhalation, skin contact, contaminated clothing, and workplace practices that lacked adequate safeguards

“Kaimahi Māori, their communities, and whenua have faced disproportionate harm from the use of this dangerous chemical. These failures breach international human rights standards and Te Tiriti o Waitangi”, says Wilkinson.

“Despite research linking PCP exposure to a wide range of health effects, many workers still face unacceptable barriers to receiving ACC cover. Without cover, they cannot access the treatment, rehabilitation, and compensation they need for illnesses and injuries caused by work,” says Wilkinson

“The story of PCP use and its impact on workers and their communities shows why strong workplace health and safety protections matter. Work should not make people sick, harm their whānau, or affect their mokopuna. We cannot let what happened to these workers happen to anyone else,” said Wilkinson

The NZCTU acknowledges the mahi of Sawmill Workers Against Poisons (SWAP) and Joe Harawira for their passionate advocacy, ongoing campaigning and pursuit of justice for those exposed to PCP through their work.

The NZCTU is calling on the Government to support the recommendations made by the Human Rights Commission in this report, provide redress to those impacted, and learn from these failures so working people are better protected in the future.

Original source: https://nz.mil-osi.com/2026/08/20/toxic-timber-chemical-legacy-shows-why-health-and-safety-rights-are-human-rights/

Back to index · Read original article


9. Tesson Holdings Limited Launches “Tesson Smart Energy” Strategy to Accelerate Industrial Deployment of New Energy Ecosystem in Mainland China and Hong Kong

August 20, 2026

Source: Media Outreach

The event was attended by core management of Tesson Holdings : Chairman and Executive Director, Mr. Wei Mingren; Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Li Jingquan; Executive Director, Mr. Li Yang; as well as distinguished guests including Ms. Li Jinying (李錦瑩), President of Logistics Planning Research Institute of CFLP; Mr. Yan An (閆安), President of the Digital Lianli Research Institute of the Jiangxi Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (中科院江西中心數字連理研究院); Professor Yu Changyuan, Chairman of Anlaseo Technology; and Dr. Cheng Zhi, Chief Executive Officer of Anlaseo Technology.

Strategic Evolution: From “Battery Manufacturing” to “Smart Energy Operation”

Source: Media Outreach

HONG KONG SAR – Media OutReach Newswire – 20 August 2026 – Tesson Holdings Limited (Stock Code: 01201.HK) recently hosted the “Tesson Smart Energy: Recharged & Ready” 2026 Brand Evolution & Strategic Partnership Signing” at Renaissance Harbour View Hotel Hong Kong. At the event, Tesson Holdings Limited formally announced its strategic upgrade from lithium-ion motive battery manufacturing business toward new energy smart electricity platform-based operation. The company also entered into strategic and industrial partnership agreements with Logistics Planning Research Institute of China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing (CFLP), Zhongke Lianli (中科连理) and Hong Kong Polytechnic University Anlaseo Technology respectively.

The event was attended by core management of Tesson Holdings : Chairman and Executive Director, Mr. Wei Mingren; Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Li Jingquan; Executive Director, Mr. Li Yang; as well as distinguished guests including Ms. Li Jinying (李錦瑩), President of Logistics Planning Research Institute of CFLP; Mr. Yan An (閆安), President of the Digital Lianli Research Institute of the Jiangxi Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (中科院江西中心數字連理研究院); Professor Yu Changyuan, Chairman of Anlaseo Technology; and Dr. Cheng Zhi, Chief Executive Officer of Anlaseo Technology.

Strategic Evolution: From “Battery Manufacturing” to “Smart Energy Operation”

Tesson Holdings has long been engaged in the research, manufacturing and sales of lithium-ion motive batteries. In 2025, the Company launched its Hong Kong-based “photovoltaic storage charging and checking” AI-inspected ultra-fast charging and zero-carbon microgrid asset operation business, completing the acquisition of the assets of seven new energy integrated service stations and marking its first step towards strategic recharge.

Mr. Wei Mingren said that the recharge does not represent a departure from the Company’s existing industrial foundation, but rather based on the company’s past decade of industrial foundation of the system of motive battery manufacturing business, the experience of the operation of charging network in Hong Kong and the capabilties of industrial integration and capital management.”Based on our manufacturing foundation, Tesson Holdings is accelerating its transformation into a smart energy platform operator, enabling every unit of electricity to unleash greater value.”

Mr. Li Jingquan outlined development pathway of the company:”Battery manufacturing → zero-carbon microgrid and energy storage operations → AI-powered electricity trading and carbon-energy asset management platform.”

He noted that Tesson will leverage its “photovoltaic storage charging and checking” microgrid operations as an entry point, collaborate with supply chain partners to develop zero-carbon microgrids and virtual power plants, while strategic upgrade gradually from an energy equipments manufacturer into a smart energy platform operator.

Mr. Li Yang further elaborated on the company’s core competitiveness built around “Data, Intelligence and Electricity”:”Data” represents the credible data base; “Intelligence” represents the AI-driven capabilities of electricity trading; “Electricity” represents capabilities of electrical assets operation.

The Company will expand its regional market presence actively, aim to secure over 10% of regional market share in multiple cities, and building an operating ecosystem servicing up to 10 billion kWh of electricity consumption.

Industrial Opportunities: Policy Support Driving New Energy Infrastructure Development in Mainland China and Hong Kong

Ms. Li Jinying (李錦瑩) noted that China is simultaneously advancing the upgrading and restructure of two major infrastructure networks — the new power system and modern logistics network.

She highlighted that logistics facilities are evolving beyond traditional transportation hubs into important industrial platforms for energy consumption, green transformation and electrical data collection. The cooperative operation of energy flows, logistics flows and data flows is reshaping the pattern of national infrastructure. Tesson Smart Energy timely deploy related industries

Since 2026, the company has entered into strategic cooperation memorandum of understanding with DST Sustainable Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (地上鐵綠色科技(深圳)股份有限公司) (DST) and China Railway First Group Co., Ltd respectively. The first pilot project of China Railway First Group, located at car park of Hoi Wang Road in Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong, and will be developed into a zero-carbon integrated facility combining parking, charging and vehicle inspection functions.

Meanwhile, the joint venture company established with DST plans to build 10 more multi-functional battery swapping stations.

The launch event follows the completion of the Company’s financing activity of placing of new shares. With the completion financing activity of placing, strategic launching and industrial partnership signings simultaneously, signaling the new energy strategic of”Tesson Smart Energy”which is driven by “Technology + Industry + Capital” formally set sail.

Strategic Partnerships Covering the Full “Industry–Research–Application” Value Chain

The three strategic partnership signings at the event covering national think tank, research institutions and university spin-offs, surrounding modern power and development of new energy ecosystem, forming a complete layout from strategic planning, technology development and commercial application.

Mr. Wei Mingren said the significance of these signings is not only “plans announcing”, but rather is “in progress and amplifying the outcomes through ecological cooperation”.

The cooperation between Tesson Holdings and Logistics Planning Research Institute of CFLP is particularly crucial. Both parties will establish a joint venture big data operation company in Beijing to formally advance to transport logistics, important scenario of power consumption.

As a national logistics think tank and the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) publishing organization, the Logistics Planning Research Institute of CFLP, both parties will work together to explore the integration path of new and renewable energy power and green logistics, pushing logistics industry to upgrade in the direction of low-carbonization and intelligentization.

Afterwards, Tesson Holdings also signed a strategic cooperation agreement with Zhongke Lianli (中科连理) focusing on development of industrial brain data resource, digitization of logistics hub energy and scenario collaboration of modernized power grid, further improving the capabilities of digitization and intelligentization of new energy industry

Finally, Tesson Holdings entered into a strategic partnership with Hong Kong Polytechnic University Anlaseo Technolgy, which is a startup incubator of Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Anlaseo Technology was also subsidized by the Hong Kong Government’s “Research, Academic and Industry Sectors One-plus Scheme (RAISe+)”.Its intelligent battery sensor system enabling intelligent lifecycle monitoring of batteries through edge computing and AI algorithm, providing the core technological support in the of field of such as electrical safety awareness and smart management. .

Future Outlook: Anchoring the Strategic Position of Smart Energy Platform Operator

With the upgrade of strategy of “Tesson Smart Energy” and the implementation of significant industrial cooperation partnership signings, Tesson Holdings is in the stage of systematically advancing the deployment of new energy ecosystem.

Looking ahead, Tesson Holdings will continue advancing systematic deployment across energy generation, distribution and consumption sectors with core strategic brand of “Tesson Smart Energy”.

Through a dual strategy combining strategic acquisitions and organic development, Tesson Holdings aims to build an integrated new energy ecosystem covering renewable energy generation, energy storage, charging infrastructure, electricity trading and carbon-energy asset management.

Hashtag: #Tesson

The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.

– Published and distributed with permission of Media-Outreach.com.

Back to index · Read original article