Source: Radio New Zealand
Epidemiologist Michael Baker. Luke Pilkinton-Ching
A leading epidemiologist says a plan to ditch an online tool tracking respiratory illness is short-sighted, and will leave a big gap in surveillance.
The Ministry of Health is not renewing its contract for the FluTracking tool, as it looks to cut costs.
FluTracking New Zealand surveyed about 40,000 people year-round, who were asked weekly whether they had any flu-like symptoms, such as fever, cough or sore throat, along with their testing and vaccination status.
It kept track of illnesses such as Influenza, Covid-19 and RSV and more than 142,000 people had participated in New Zealand since May 2018.
FluTracking was administered in Australia and cost the ministry about $57,000 a year.
But the ministry said it needed to find savings, and would instead use other surveillance tools, such as Healthline data, to track respiratory illness in New Zealand.
“We need to ensure good value for investment in public health and seek efficiencies where they do not impact service delivery,” said a spokesperson.
It said FluTracking had been one of the data inputs into the New Zealand Respiratory Illness Dashboard maintained by PHF Science. It said it sat alongside other respiratory illness surveillance activities, including at GP clinics, hospitals and through calls to Healthline.
Epidemiologist Michael Baker, who is also a professor in the Department of Public Health at the University of Otago, told RNZ he was disappointed.
He said it was the only system across all of Australia’s six states and New Zealand, which enabled both countries to compare.
It was also the only system to provide information on people who had not seen a doctor or been admitted to hospital.
“It’s a really important sector of the population that we don’t have data on otherwise,” Baker said.
In 2024, there was an average of 30,000 responses per week.
He hoped it had not been defunded as a cost-saving measure, as it was a low-cost system for New Zealand to participate in.
“There’s just a fairly modest fee we pay to Australia just to support the operation of the system, plus I think there’s some staff involved at PHF Science to keep it going, so this is one of the most cost-effective tools we’ve got.”
Baker did not think that the FluTracking programme could be replaced.
He said it filled what had become “a big gap in our surveillance” that disappeared around Covid.
“We do have good data on people who go to hospital with severe respiratory infections. We do have some lab-based surveillance. But we’re really missing this very important base of the pyramid, that is people with less severe illness who are not going to see a doctor, or even those that do go and see a doctor. We just don’t have a good record of how many people are in that situation.”
Baker said the decision was short-sighted, especially as it ran all year.
“Very few of our other systems do that. Most of them are concentrated in the flu season period. So it does tell us what’s happening throughout the whole year.”
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
– Published by EveningReport.nz and AsiaPacificReport.nz, see: MIL OSI in partnership with Radio New Zealand
