Source: Health and Disability Commissioner
Note: the events outlined in this report took place in 2021
In two reports published today, Deputy Health and Disability Commissioner Deborah James has found two GPs working separately breached the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (the Code) for inappropriately issuing medical certificates for COVID-19 vaccine exemption.
Neither GP was able to provide evidence that they had provided their patients with balanced, evidence-based information around the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. Failure to provide this was contrary to the expectations set by the Medical Council of New Zealand.
The first GP provided voluntary services at a community clinic and issued certificates to 12 patients stating that it was medically inappropriate for them to receive the COVID-19 vaccination due to underlying health conditions.
Ms James found that eleven of the medical certificates did not provide a sound reason for vaccine exemption, which did not comply with standards required by the Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) on medical certification.
Ms James said, “I am critical that the GP prioritised their patients’ desire for a medical certificate for vaccine exemption over adherence to the applicable law, guidance, and professional standards, including the MCNZ’s expectations around medical certification and professional responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The second GP issued three exemption letters to patients which were based on insufficient information. The GP knew these were invalid as exemptions, due to the change in guidance from the Ministry of Health at this time.
Ms James said she was concerned that this GP’s strongly held views about the ethics of the public health response to COVID-19 was a motive for his actions. “While I respect a health practitioner’s right to their private opinions, professional health practice demands that practitioners behave in accordance with the law, standards, and guidance that apply to their profession.”
Ms James found the second GP also breached the Code for failing to clinically manage the stress of the three patients who received exemption letters, despite certifying that they each required a month of leave due to workplace stress and his stated concern about their welfare.
In addition, the record-keeping by both GPs fell short of the accepted practice.
Ms James made recommendations for both GPs, outlined in the reports. She also recommended that the Medical Council of New Zealand consider if a review of both GPs competence is warranted.
