Source: Media Outreach
Singapore and Tokyo remain in the top five – third and fifth respectively – with Sydney coming in fourth.
The remaining top 10 cities are: Amsterdam (6th), Wellington (7th), Hong Kong and Melbourne (tied 8th) and Stockholm (10th)
The 2021 edition of the index includes a new pillar for environmental security
TOKYO, JAPAN – Media OutReach – 23 August 2021 – The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) today releases the fourth edition of the Safe Cities Index (SCI). The index, which is the centre piece of a research project sponsored by NEC Corporation, ranks 60 cities worldwide across five continents. It measures the multifaceted nature of urban safety, with 76 indicators organised along five pillars: personal, health, infrastructure, digital, and – new this year – environmental security.
In each of the last three iterations, Tokyo, Singapore and Osaka – always in that order – have been our index leaders. This year Copenhagen comes first, with 82.4 points out of 100, and Toronto follows close behind with 82.2. This change reflects not a tectonic shift but more a reordering among cities that have always come close to the top. In all four editions of our index, six cities – Amsterdam, Melbourne, Tokyo, Toronto, Singapore and Sydney – have all figured among the leading ten, with only a few points separating them.
Naka Kondo, senior editor of The EIU and editor of the SCI2021 report says:
“Covid-19 is the first global pandemic to strike humanity since we became a predominantly urban species. Experts have told us covid-19 has changed the whole concept of urban safety. Digital security is now an even higher priority as more work and commerce have moved online; those responsible for infrastructure safety have to adjust to dramatic changes in travel patterns and where residents consume utilities; agencies responsible for personal security need to address a large, lockdown-driven shift in crime patterns; and the priority that urban residents and officials assign to environmental security has risen markedly as covid-19 serves as a stark warning of unexpected crises.”
The index framework has been subjected to an extensive reevaluation and has undergone significant changes, including updates to existing indicators, updates to scoring methodology, addition of new indicators under existing domains and the addition of a new domain to the framework.
The introduction of the new pillar for environmental security in this year’s index reflects the increased importance of sustainability issues and climate adaptation measures amid the pandemic. Toronto and Copenhagen performed noticeably better in the new environmental security pillar than do any of the top-three cities from earlier years. Interestingly, the index also shows that leading middle-income cities do far better in this area than in any other categories. In particular, three at this income level finish in the pillar’s top ten: Bogota (4th); Rio de Janeiro (8th); and Kuala Lumpur (10th).
Overall ranking SCI 2021
Overall Ranking – Safe Cities Index 2021
1
Copenhagen
21
Madrid
41
Bogota
2
Toronto
22
Dallas
42
Mexico City
3
Singapore
23
Paris
43
Bangkok
4
Sydney
24
Taipei
44
Quito
5
Tokyo
25
Seoul
45
Ho Chi Minh City
6
Amsterdam
26
Brussels
46
Jakarta
7
Wellington
27
Milan
47
Johannesburg
8
Hong Kong
28
Lisbon
48
New Delhi
8
Melbourne
29
Rome
49
Riyadh
10
Stockholm
30
Shanghai
50
Mumbai
11
Barcelona
31
Abu Dhabi
51
Manila
11
New York
32
Kuala Lumpur
52
Baku
13
Frankfurt
33
Santiago
53
Kuwait city
14
Washington DC
34
Buenos Aires
54
Dhaka
15
London
35
Dubai
55
Casablanca
15
San Francisco
36
Beijing
56
Lagos
17
Osaka
37
Istanbul
57
Cairo
18
Los Angeles
38
Moscow
58
Caracas
19
Zurich
39
Rio de Janeiro
59
Karachi
20
Chicago
40
Sao Paulo
60
Yangon
Very High
High
Medium
Research shows that the performance of different safety pillars correlates very closely with each other, signifying that different kinds of safety are thoroughly intertwined. The top performers in each pillar are as follows:
Digital security: Sydney (1), Singapore (2), Copenhagen (3), Los Angeles / San Francisco (4),
Health security: Tokyo (1), Singapore (2), Hong Kong (3), Melbourne (4), Osaka (5)
Infrastructure security: Hong Kong (1), Singapore (2), Copenhagen (3), Toronto (4), Tokyo (5)
Personal security: Copenhagen (1), Amsterdam (2), Frankfurt (3), Stockholm (4), Brussels (5)
Environmental Security: Wellington (1), Toronto (2), Washington DC (3), Bogota (4), Milan (5)
The Safe Cities Index reveals that different global region have distinct strengths. In particular, well-off Asia-Pacific cities tend to perform better on average when it comes to health security and infrastructure security, while European cities on personal security and North American cities on digital security.
Visit safecities.economist.com for the full report, index and workbook
How safe is your city? Benchmark your city to any of the 60 indexed cities with the “Urban safety benchmarking tool”
In conjunction with the release of the Safe Cities index, The Economist Events will programme a 45 minute session as part of NEC Visionary Week 2021. This session will include a presentation of the highlights of the Safe Cities Summit Index results as well as a discussion with a high ranking official from a municipal government and CTO of KMD to explore how city leaders can develop a holistic approach to the development of safe cities for all. The presentation and panel discussion will be available free to view here.
– Published and distributed with permission of Media-Outreach.com.
