The commercial property sector is deeply concerned with both Labour and National policies to remove depreciation for non-residential buildings. “Depreciation of commercial and industrial properties is critical for the future health of New Zealand’s built environment” says Property Council New Zealand Chief Executive Leonie Freeman.
“The proposed policies to remove depreciation are a raid on long-term maintenance funds for New Zealand’s buildings, running the risk of rundown or even derelict buildings across the country.”
“If depreciation is removed, property owners tell us they will have to reprioritise expenditure, which when added to rising costs such as insurance, mortgage and property rate rises, will likely cause rent rises for businesses” says Freeman.
“Both parties have been inconsistent on depreciation of commercial buildings. Previous indications from the Government were that depreciation was introduced as a permanent measure, and the property sector planned future developments based on this premise. The National Party has also announced that depreciation would be extended to residential properties, such as Build to Rent, if elected. These inconsistencies create uncertainty in a market that is already facing significant challenges.”
“There are multiple challenges currently facing the property sector. From high interest rates and inflation to a reduced construction pipeline which affects jobs for Kiwis. Removing access to depreciation will place another challenge on our road to sustainability by making it much harder to maintain and upgrade our buildings.”
The proposed policies will come with a price tag of half a billion dollars for the property sector. However, Freeman said that both Labour and National have failed to see the consequential impacts.
“Removing depreciation will have flow on effects of aging buildings, a reduction of new projects in the development pipeline, and increased costs to businesses who occupy buildings. Without commercial and industrial buildings having access to depreciation, there is significant risk to forward investment. Put simply, less development in the pipeline.”
Property Council members have told us of incidences where they have paid over half of a building’s value for seismic strengthening upgrades. “The last thing we want to see is deprivation of investment in our buildings such as important seismic strengthening upgrades” says Freeman.
The economic evidence from Inland Revenue indicates that commercial and industrial buildings do depreciate in value.
“Our members are concerned this will cause the New Zealand commercial property sector to lose its competitive edge from an investor standpoint against other developed countries, in which property owners are able to depreciate their buildings.”
“It is disappointing that both Labour and National have gone for a quick cash injection, rather than thinking through the consequences of removing depreciation. Access to depreciation allows for investment in the long-term maintenance and safety of our buildings. For New Zealand to have a sustainable and resilient built environment, it is critical that depreciation remains.”
