Health Investigation – Delayed diabetes diagnosis 20HDC02300

0
1

Source: Health and Disability Commissioner

Two general practitioners breached the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (the Code) in their care of a four year old girl.
The young girl was seen by the two doctors over two consecutive appointments. In both consultations, the girl’s abnormal urine results, obtained by triage nurses, were overlooked. The girl presented to another doctor a few days later and was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and referred to hospital for treatment. The delayed diagnosis caused significant stress for the girl’s family.
Dr Caldwell found that by failing to appropriately review and act on the abnormal urine results both doctors breached Right 4(1) of the Code, which gives consumers the right to services of an appropriate standard.
“The accepted practice is for a GP to review triage observations as part of patient assessment,” said Dr Caldwell. “I am critical that both doctors overlooked the urine results during their appointments with the girl. In my view, the doctors’ omissions led to a delay in the girl being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.”
Dr Caldwell noted that while the medical centre is also responsible for providing services in accordance with the Code, the deficiencies in the doctors’ care were individual clinical failures. However, she did make an adverse comment about the company’s triage guidelines. “I am concerned that the triage guidelines in place at the time were not sufficiently clear to guide nursing staff to appropriately respond to a child at risk,” Dr Caldwell said.
“Nonetheless, guidelines should not replace clinical judgement and critical thinking. Regardless of the adequacy of the guidelines in place at the time, I am most concerned that two doctors at the centre failed to look at the urine test results, despite the results being available for their perusal.”
Dr Caldwell recommended that both doctors provide a written apology to the family for the breaches in care. She also made a number of recommendations to the medical centre, including that they provide HDC updates regarding changes to triage resources and the effectiveness of those changes and that they use the HDC report to share lessons and educate staff.
“I acknowledge that the medical centre, and the doctors have altered their practice (including introducing a Paediatric Early Warning Score) to prevent any further omissions, and have created new policies and tools to better identify risk to its younger patients,” Dr Caldwell said.  

MIL OSI

Previous articleCulture and Heritage – 50 Years Since New Zealand Government’s Pacific Nuclear Protest
Next articleEconomy News – Business NZ says it is a Rocky Road ahead