Transforming Education Summit: Warm words and good intentions, but the education crisis requires bolder action

New and action-orientated commitments arising from the TES were limited. Six official ‘Calls to Action’ were published, stemming from a series of consultations and development of several discussion papers, which were important in creating a better and joint understanding of the deepening education crisis. But there is little clarity on what happens next to put these words into action, nor is it clear exactly who has endorsed the calls to action.

113 countries also submitted statements of commitment at the TES. The Secretary General’s Vision Statement encourages “countries that have registered a National Statement of Commitment can translate those commitments into a clear road map for transformation”. But many governments simply re-affirmed existing commitments, and there were far fewer significant new commitments. 

Ahead of the Transforming Education Pre-Summit in Paris, Save the Children published a blog setting out what we wanted to see from the Summit in order to deem it a success. Here we give our assessment on how well the Summit performed against these criteria: 

     1. Inclusivity and child participation must be at the heart of the summit  

We wrote back in July that no summit about the education and futures of children and young people should take place without their meaningful participation. Youth were indeed involved throughout the process, at the pre-summit and at the summit itself. But to our knowledge, very few under 18s were involved in the process leading up to the TES or in the Summit itself, either in-person or virtually. Where youth were involved, it wasn’t clear that these were youth representing marginalised and/or under-represented groups.  

The Youth Declaration was the strongest appeal for action made at the Summit. It represents a real testament to the power of voices who have been directly impacted by the learning crisis and want to see action. In their own words: “For too long we have been excluded or only tokenistically included in the policy and decision-making processes affecting our lives, livelihoods and futures. In transforming education, we demand that our voices are heard, our lived experiences valued, our demands addressed, and our efforts, leadership, and agency acknowledged.” 

The Youth Declaration was arguably more ambitious and urgent than the UNSG’s Vision Statement. The vision statement spells out the scale of the crisis facing education and the key ingredients for transformation, but falls short in responding to the urgency of this crisis. It is not an actionable road map for accelerating progress towards SDG4. 

It’s essential that follow up to the Youth Declaration is not side-lined, and that youth representatives from the SDG4 Youth network play a meaningful role with the SDG4 High-Level Steering Committee in creating an action plan to take forwards the Youth Declaration. It is important that this process also includes participation from children under the age of 18. 

Save the Children supports non-formal schools in rural parts of Uganda. The NORAD-funded programme has constructed new classrooms and teachers’ accommodation; trained teachers on new participatory learning approaches, such as ‘Literacy Boost’ and ‘Numeracy Boost’. Andrew Pacutho / Save the Children

    2. Recognise the challenges facing global education & recommit to foundational learning  

The challenges facing education were certainly well explored and set out in the discussion papers that were produced in advance of the Summit. But given that the Summit was in-part convened in response to the global learning crisis, it was disappointing that only 40% of countries prioritised measures to address learning loss in the national statements of commitment. 

It is essential that this Call to Action, along with the others five Calls to Action, are turned into clear, measurable and time-bound actions, with clear accountability for governments and international actors.

    3. The summit must plan for future crises   

Children’s access to education is under serious threat from the intersecting and ongoing crises of climate change, conflict and COVID-19. We noted back in June that any commitments made as part of thorough national consultation processes should include anticipatory planning which future-proofs education systems against new global health crises, conflict, economic shocks, and sudden and slow-onset disasters linked to climate change. 

It was welcomed that education in emergencies was a key theme of the Summit, and that one of the Calls to Action focused on education in crisis situations , and that this document recognises the need to build the resilience of education systems in response to crises. Many countries in their statements of commitment also underlined this need, specifically by investing in digital learning to prepare for future shocks, and strengthen capacity-building in disaster-risk reduction and climate change adaptation within the education sector.

    4. The summit must build on existing momentum    

We noted that whilst this Summit was welcomed, it was important that any commitments or declarations coming out of it were clearly building on momentum from existing agreed commitments – such as the Kenyatta Declaration, Incheon Declaration and the Safe Schools Declaration, to name just a few.  

It was certainly good to hear that President Akufo-Addo of Ghana is carrying forward the Kenyatta Declaration – this is crucial to maintaining momentum of domestic education financing. 

But on the whole, there has been little in the way of updates on how governments are delivering on existing commitments – the G7 Girls’ Education Declaration being one of the most recent examples. 

     5. Leaders must put their money where it matters 

In the end, none of the commitments made at the TES will amount to anything unless there is more and better funding for education – the global financing gap to meet SDG4 is estimated to be as high as $200 billion annually. Yet as Save the Children noted in a recent briefing, one-third of low- and lower middle-income countries are spending more on external debt servicing than they are on children’s education. 

At TES, there was the formal launch of the International Finance Facility for Education, a loans-based mechanism that will support education in lower-middle income countries. This is welcomed, since these countries are home to some of the largest numbers of out-of-school children. There was also new funding announced for UNGEI and the Education Cannot Wait fund. These announcements are also welcomed, but are still a drop in the ocean compared to what is needed to fill the financing gap.

Ladan*, 10, and Sahra*, 10, with their friends at a Child Friendly Space in Puntland, Somalia. Mustafa Saeed / Save the Children