Post sponsored by NewzEngine.com

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 14 April 2021
Last updated 14 April 2021

This page provides links to the PBRF Sector Reference Group consultation papers, the consultation feedback summaries and decision documents.
This page provides links to the PBRF Sector Reference Group consultation papers, the consultation feedback summaries and decision documents.

The Sector Reference Group (SRG) consults with the sector and other stakeholders on a range of implementation issues as part of the development of operational guidelines for the 2018 Quality Evaluation.
The consultation process is now complete. The decision documents with the SRG’s recommendations to the TEC and the detailed stakeholder feedback summaries are available. The TEC’s decisions on these matters form the basis of the draft operational now available on the 2018 Quality Evaluation web page.   

No.
Consultation paper   

Consultation period

Consultation status

Decision status     
1

Approach to thedesign of the 2018Quality Evaluation
(PDF, 475 Kb)

1 – 29 Sept 2014

CLOSED
PBRF 2018 Design Feedback Summary
(PDF, 64 Kb)

 
2

Review of staff eligibilitycriteria 
(PDF, 255 Kb) 

31 Oct -12 Dec 2014

CLOSED
PBRF Staff Eligibility Feedback Summary 
(PDF,110 Kb)

In-principle decisions for staff eligibility criteria 
(PDF, 286 Kb) 

3

Developing EvidencePortfolios – operationalguidance for the ResearchContribution component
(PDF, 439 Kb)

4 Dec 2014 -11 Feb 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Research Contribution Feedback Summary 
(PDF,397 Kb)

In-principle decisions for the Research Contribution component
(PDF,115 Kb)

4

Establishing a Pacificresearch peer review panel 
(PDF, 203 Kb)

26 Feb -9 April 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Pacific Research peer review panel Feedback Summary
(PDF, 85 Kb)

Decisions for the Pacific research peer review  panel
(PDF, 73 Kb)

5

Peer review panel establishmentand conflict of interest policy 
(PDF, 385 Kb)

10 March -20 April 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Panel and Conflict of Interest Feedback Summary 
(PDF, 174 Kb)

Decision on the Peer review panel establishment and conflict of interest policy 
(PDF, 121 Kb)

6

Developing EvidencePortfolios – operationalguidance for the ResearchOutput component 
(PDF, 270 Kb) 

31 March -8 May 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Research Output Feedback Summary
(PDF, 534 Kb)

In-principle Decisions for the Research Output Component
(PDF, 151 Kb)

7

Review of the general and CanterburyEarthquakes Special Circumstances provisions
(PDF,  192 Kb)

2 June -13 July 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Special Circumstances Feedback Summary
(PDF, 67 Kb)

In-principle Decisions for the General and Canterbury Earthquakes Special Circumstances Provisions
(PDF, 102 Kb)

8

Review of the assessment framework – Part 1: Potential changes to the framework 
(PDF, 205 Kb)
Supporting document: Appendix to Review of the assessment framework (PDF, 265 Kb)

13 July -21 August 2015

CLOSED
PBRF Assessment Framework (Part 1) Feedback Summary
(PDF, 79 Kb)

In-principle Decisions for the Assessment Framework (Part 1)
(PDF, 205 Kb)

9

Review of the TEO audit process 
(PDF, 210 Kb)

13 July -21 August 2015

CLOSED
PBRF TEO Audit ProcessFeedback Summary
(PDF, 79 Kb)

Decisions on the TEO Audit Process
(PDF, 117 Kb)

10

Review of the technical specifications for the 2018 quality evaluation information technology system (PDF, 235 Kb)
Technical documentation:
These documents are available on request:
Draft Evidence Portfolio Schema Definition
Draft Evidence Portfolio Template
Draft Staff Data File Specification  

13 July – 21 August 2015

 CLOSED
PBRF technical specifications and sector Feedback Summary
(PDF, 67 Kb)

Decisions on the technical specifications
(PDF, 151 Kb)

11

Review of the assessment framework – Part 2 
(PDF, 296 Kb)

30 November 2015 – 9 February 2016

CLOSED
PBRF Assessment  Framework (Part 2) Feedback Summary
(PDF, 110 Kb)

Decisions on Assessment Framework
(Part 2) (PDF, 126 Kb)

Top
 

MIL OSI