MIL OSI – Source: New Zealand Human Rights Commission – Release/Statement
Headline: Submission on the Oranga Tamariki Amendment Bill published
The Human Rights Commission welcomes the introduction of the Children, Young Person and their Families (Oranga Tamariki) Bill. The Bill has significant implications for the rights and well-being of children and young people in New Zealand. It is the cornerstone of the Government’s modernisation the care and protection and youth justice sectors, and introduces a range of policy and operational reforms.
The Commission supports and commends the Bill’s progressive human rights aspects. The Bill recognises and affirms of the rights of children and young people under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCROC), the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons (UNCRPD) with Disabilities to an extent that is unprecedented in New Zealand social sector legislation. The Commission also supports the Bill’s approach in removing the current distinctions that exist in with regards to children with disabilities. However, the Commission has recommended that a specific care and protection principle is added to ensure that support and advocacy services for children with disabilities and their families are provided at the earliest opportunity.
The Bill also brings the youth justice system further into line with international human rights standards by expanding it to include 17 year olds, with an exception for those charged with a serious offence. The Commission strongly supports the recommendation of the Children’s Commissioner that this exception is removed. The Commission has also made a number of recommendations aimed at further improving the Bill’s consistency with international human rights standards on youth justice.
Other aspects of the Bill have more challenging human rights implications. The Bill affects the ethical duties of practitioners regarding confidentiality and introduces broad powers that enable agencies to gather and share data about individual children and groups of children. The Commission considers that, while the safety of children is paramount, this aspect of the Bill may have the unintended consequence of deterring vulnerable children and their families from engaging with support services. The Commission has therefore recommended that changes are made to the Bill that ensure that privacy, ethical and human rights considerations are adequately reflected in information sharing processes and decision-making.
The Bill also appears to shift towards a more interventionist care and protection model that places less priority on retaining a child’s connection with family, whānau, hapū or iwi, following removal from parental care. The Commission considers that this approach is at odds with many of the Bill’s general principles and has recommended that the current care and protection principles regarding the role of family, whānau, hapū or iwi are retained.
The Bill also sits against the background of increased public awareness about historic abuse and ill treatment of children while in the care of the state and the Commission’s call for an independent inquiry. The Bill notably does not introduce amendments aimed at residential facilities and, in the Commission’s view, cannot be seen as a response to or recognition of the state’s past failings. In light of this, the Commission has asked the select committee to consider whether it can be assured that the Bill will prevent the future occurrence of systemic failures that could lead to the abuse of children in state care.
Lastly, the Commission considers that the review of the care and protection and youth justice system cannot be considered in isolation of the underlying socio-economic stressors that lead to, or precipitate, family and whānau breakdown. This includes household poverty and material deprivation.